Translation of exam points in Russian. Assessment Criteria for the Unified State Exam Maximum for the test part in Russian

In the USE in the Russian language 2017, 25 tasks are assessed, of which 24 are tests, and 25 are an essay on the text. Today, in the test tasks, it is necessary either to write down the words correctly (and not just find them), or find two correct answers from the proposed ones (tasks 1 and 15), or name the numbers indicating the correct setting of the commas. Task 7 remains difficult, where it is necessary to correlate the erroneous sentences with the rules according to which mistakes were made.

1 point for a correct answer, 0 points for an incorrect one	0 to 2 points	0 to 4 points	0 to 5 points
For the correct fulfillment of tasks 2-6, 8-14, 16-23 examinee gets 1 point. For an incorrect answer or its absence, 0 points.	For completing tasks 1 and 15, you can get from 0 to 2 points. The answer is considered correct if it contains all the numbers from the standard and is absent other numbers. 1 point is given if: one of the numbers indicated in the answer, does not correspond to the standard; one of the digits specified in the standard is missing answer. In all other cases 0 points are awarded.	For completing task 24, you can get from 0 to 4 points. Loyal	For completing task 7, you can get from 0 to 5 points. Loyal the answer is considered, in which there are all the numbers from the standard and there are no others numbers. For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to a number from list, the examinee receives 1 point.
Maximum points
Minimum points

Essay evaluation criteria

		Points
	Formulating source code problems
	The examinee (in one form or another) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. There are no actual errors associated with understanding and formulating the problem.
	The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the original text.
	Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text
	The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on. There are no actual errors related to understanding the source text in the comments.
	The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on, made no more than 1 factual error in the comments related to the understanding of the original text.
	The problem formulated by the examinee is not commented on, made more than 1 factual error in the comments related to understanding the original text, commented on another problem not formulated by the examinee, as a commentary, a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given, a large portion of the original text is cited as comments.
	The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented issue. There are no actual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the original text.
	Argumentation by the examinee of their own opinion on the problem
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued for it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature).
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, relying on knowledge or life experience), made only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature.
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge, life or reading experience.
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, OR the examinee's opinion is only formally stated (for example: "I agree / disagree with the author"), not reflected in the work at all.
	SPEECH DESIGN OF THE ESSAY
	Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation
	The examiner's work is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation: There are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; There are no violations of the paragraph division of the text in the work.
	The examiner's work is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, 1 logical error was made, in the work there is 1 violation of the paragraph division of the text.
	In the work of the examinee, a communicative intention is visible, more than 1 logical error was made, there are 2 cases of violation of the paragraph division of the text.
	Accuracy and expressiveness of speech
	The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech.
	The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thought, the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought.
	The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the vocabulary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech.
	LITERACY
	Compliance with spelling norms
	no spelling errors (or 1 blunder)
	1-2 mistakes were made
	more than 2-3 mistakes were made
	more than 3 mistakes were made	0
	Compliance with punctuation norms
	no punctuation errors (or 1 blunder)
	1-2 mistakes were made
	2-3 mistakes were made
	more than 3 errors	0
	Compliance with language norms
	no grammatical errors
	1-2 mistakes were made
	more than 2 mistakes were made
	Compliance with speech norms
	no more than 1 speech error was made
	2-3 mistakes were made
	more than 3 mistakes were made
	Compliance with ethical standards
	there are no ethical mistakes in work
	ethical mistakes were made (1 or more)
	Maintaining factual accuracy in background material
	no actual errors in background material
	made mistakes of fact (1 or more) in the background material
	Maximum points for an essay

When assessing literacy (K7 – K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account. The grading norms shown in the table are designed for an essay with a volume of 150-300 words. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is estimated at 0 points, the task is considered not completed.

When counting words, both independent and service parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, "all the same" - one word, "all the same" - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account in the calculation (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two words).
If the essay contains the text of the review of task 24 and / or information about the author of the text, partially or completely rewritten by the examinee, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.

When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7 – K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - there are no spelling mistakes (or one blunder was made);
K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one blunder was made).

1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two mistakes were made;
К8 - one or three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to the K7 – K12 criteria for work of 70 to 150 words is not given.

If the essay is a retelling or completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of verification (К1К12) is estimated at 0 points. If the work, which is a rewritten or retold source text, contains fragments of the examinee's text, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account in the check. A work written without reference to the text read (not according to this text) is not evaluated.

In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of secondary general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400, registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 03, 2014 No. 31205) “61. According to the results of the first and second examinations, the experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks of the exam paper with a detailed answer ... 62. In the event of a significant discrepancy in the points given by two experts, a third test is assigned. A significant difference in scores was determined in the assessment criteria for the corresponding academic subject. The expert carrying out the third check is provided with information about the points given by the experts who previously checked the exam paper. "
A significant discrepancy is considered to be a discrepancy of 8 or more primary points between the sums of points given by the first and second experts for completing task 25 (for all 12 assessment positions). In this case, the third expert must give points only for those assessment positions for which the points given by the first and second experts differ.

Next year, the Russian government decided to amend the state compulsory exam of the Unified State Exam. It is planned to introduce the oral part of the exam in the Russian language 2017. Algorithms for the oral part are already there. As with the delivery of foreign languages \u200b\u200borally, the student listens to the assignment for twenty minutes and answers five questions, describing the picture and asking questions. Then the reviewers listen to the student's recording and give a grade. This model of the oral part of the exam in the Russian language suits the experts. The only thing that is required from the government of the country is to quickly and efficiently equip premises for passing this type of exam. Because, unlike foreign languages, about 700 thousand applicants pass Russian annually. The only aesthetic inconvenience is the passing of an oral exam for children with speech impairments, but this is now being considered by teachers to improve the overall delivery system.

At the end of May, 11th grade graduates will face a rather difficult test - USE in the Russian language 2017... This exam is considered compulsory, the same as mathematics, so everyone, without exception, will have to take it. Today, the main task for eleventh graders is timely preparation for the test so that the certificate is not spoiled by a bad grade. In addition, a high score for the Unified State Exam in the Russian language opens the doors to the most prestigious universities in the country for the future applicant.

Most of the students, assuming that tests in the Russian language are not as difficult as mathematics or physics, do not prepare for the subject at all and, as a result, receive insufficiently high scores. It must be remembered that the exam affects not only materials for grade 11, but also topics from previous years of study. In addition, the USE includes tasks that require extraordinary thinking. As you can see, the Russian language is not such a simple subject, and considering the future, projected for 2017, it will become even more difficult.

What should you prepare for?

The fact that a number of innovations await tests in the Russian language has been said more than once. Over the years, scientists and teachers have been developing an optimal knowledge test system that could reflect the real knowledge of students. In 2017, it is planned to introduce the oral part in the exam in the Russian language. This has already been stated by Lyudmila Verbitskaya (head of the Russian Academy of Education).

At this stage, all the necessary transformations have already been developed. It remains only to understand how to use them rationally in this.

Until 2017, all students of general education schools took the Russian language in writing. The test form, which was in the forms, of course, is a good thing, but it is not able to reflect the real knowledge of the graduates, because they can simply guess the answer. But what about punctuation or spelling? Tests are not able to thoroughly show the student's literacy.

The oral exam will help you identify gaps in knowledge, the ability to accurately express your thoughts, add sentences from words, and lead a narrative that examiners understand.

In our time, the correct formulation of speech is extremely important, especially in sectors of the economy. Any leader should be able to formulate tasks for subordinates, be able to express thoughts and convey their ideas to others. For this, every student must learn spelling, as well as learn the basics of public speaking.

The oral block is far from all the changes that await the Russian language exam. In the coming 2017, officials intend to introduce a grading system for the control essay. Recall that at the moment, for the manifestation of creative abilities and the ability to logically build their own thoughts, the student received simply "credit" or "failure".

Lyudmila Verbitskaya considers this an unfair approach, especially for those students who can show their level of knowledge through essay. Only the introduction of a clear grading scale will help to clearly recognize the student's level of preparedness and form a clear objective view of the exam.

Dates

Early exams will begin on May 25, 2017. It is during this period that eleventh graders will be able to pass the Russian language. The main tests are scheduled for May 30. Retake For those who “failed” the subject or wish to improve their grade, there will be an opportunity to pass the re-examination on June 27. The reserve days are designated April 15 and September 24.

Conducting the exam in the Russian language

To cope with all the tasks, students are given an hour. Within the allotted time, it is necessary to solve all two blocks, which include 24 questions. The first block consists of questions that must be answered in digital or verbal form. On the second form, students must write an essay on a given topic.

Rating scale

Back in 2015, it was possible to get "pass / fail" for this test. Since 2016, points have appeared, the amount of which depended on the number of correct answers. From the table below, you can find out the exact number of points that can be obtained for a particular question.

The second part of the exam requires the student to be creative and fluent in Russian. Note that essays are graded in a special way, so one cannot surprise an examiner with grammar alone.

For a correctly done second part of the exam, a student can earn 25 points. In general, for two blocks the graduate will earn 57 points, to which points are added on other criteria. Considering that the knowledge assessment system is 100-point, in order to understand what grade the student earned, it is enough to refer to this scheme:

• 0 - 24 - "two"
• 25 - 57 - "three"
• 58 - 71 - "four"
• from 72 - "five"

Note that the minimum number of points for admission to a university is only 36 points, but to obtain a certificate, it is enough to score 24 points.

Materials for preparing for the exam in the Russian language

Now a lot of literature is published annually, which helps future graduates to prepare for the exam. In addition, a lot of additional materials are provided for general access on the FIPI official website, namely:

1. Demo version of the exam
2. Quest Forms
3. Training compilations
4. Video consultations

Among the most optimal literature for preparation, it is worth highlighting the manual from the author Tsybulko I.P.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

EXAM IN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE IN 11 GRADES (USE)

For the correct execution of all assignmentsexamination work can be obtained as much as possible 55 primary points.

For the correct execution each tasks parts 1 (except for tasks 7, 15 and 24) the graduate receives 1 point each... For an incorrect answer or lack of it, 0 points are given.

For completing assignments 7 can be exposed from 0 to 5 points... For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the number from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (5 points: no mistakes; 4 points: 1 mistake was made; 3 points: 2 mistakes were made; 2 points: 2 numbers are correctly indicated; 1 point: correctly indicated only one digit; 0 points: completely incorrect answer, i.e. incorrect sequence of numbers or its absence). The order in which the numbers are written in the answer matters.

For completing assignments 15 can be exposed from 0 to 2 points... For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the number of the answer, the examinee receives 1 point. If 2 numbers are correct, the examinee gets 2 points.

For completing assignments 24 can be exposed from 0 to 4 points... For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the number of a term from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (4 points: no mistakes; 3 points: 1 mistake was made; 2 points: 2 mistakes were made; 1 point: only one number was correctly indicated; 0 points: completely wrong answer, that is, wrong sequence of digits or its absence The order of writing the digits in the answer matters.

Maximum pointsthat can be obtained by a student who has completed the assignment correctly part 2, is 23 points.

Evaluation criteria for an assignment with a detailed answer (composition)

Criteria for evaluating the answer to task C1

Points

I

Content of the essay

K1

Formulating source code problems

The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text.


There are no actual errors in understanding and formulating the problem

1

The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the original text.

0

K2

Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text

The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. Factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text,
 no comments

2

The problem formulated by the examinee is not commented on,or there were more than 1 factual error in the comments related to understanding the original text,or commented on another problem not formulated by the examinee,or as comments, a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given,
 or a large fragment of the source text is cited as comments

0

K3

The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented issue.
There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the original text

1

0

K4

Argumentation by the examinee of their own opinion on the problem

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued for it (brought at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature)

3

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, relying on knowledge, life experience), orgave only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature

2

The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge, life experience

1

The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, orthe examinee's opinion is stated only formally (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”), orthe examinee's opinion is not reflected at all in the work

0

II

Speech design of the essay

K5

Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation

The examiner's work is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation:
- there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken;
- in the work there are no violations of paragraph division text

2

The examiner's work is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but1 logical error was made, and / orthere is 1 violation of the paragraph division of the text in the work

1

In the work of the examinee, a communicative intention is visible,
 but more than 1 logical error was made,
 and / or there are 2 cases of violation of paragraph division of the text

0

K6

Accuracy and expressiveness of speech

The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech.
* The examinee receives the highest score on this criterion only if the highest score is obtained according to the K10 criterion

2

The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thought, butthe monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, orthe work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, butthere are violations of the accuracy of expression

1

The examiner's work is distinguished by the poverty of the vocabulary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech

0

III

Literacy

K7

Compliance with spelling norms

no spelling errors (or 1 blunder)

3

no more than 2 mistakes were made

2

3-4 mistakes were made

1

more than 4 mistakes were made

0

K8

Compliance with punctuation norms

no punctuation errors (or 1 blunder)

3

1–3 mistakes were made

2

4-5 mistakes were made

1

more than 5 mistakes were made

0

K9

Compliance with language norms

no grammatical errors

2

1-2 mistakes were made

1

more than 2 mistakes were made

0

K10

Compliance with speech norms

no more than 1 speech error was made

2

2-3 mistakes were made

1

more than 3 mistakes were made

0

K11

Compliance with ethical standards

there are no ethical mistakes in work

1

ethical mistakes were made (1 or more)

0

K12.

Maintaining factual accuracy in background material

no actual errors in background material

1

made mistakes of fact (1 or more) in the background material

0

Maximum points for all written work (K1 – K12)

When assessing literacy (K7 – K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account. The grading norms shown in the table are designed for an essay with a volume of 150-300 words.

If the essay has less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is estimated at zero points, the task is considered unfulfilled.

When evaluating an essay in volume 70 to 150 words number of errors allowed four types (K7-K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:

K7 - there are no spelling errors (or 1 blunder was made);

K8 - no punctuation errors (or 1 minor mistake).

1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:

K7 - no more than 2 mistakes were made;

К8 - 1-3 mistakes were made;

K9 - no grammatical errors;

K10 - no more than 1 speech error was made.

Highest mark by criteria K7-K12 for work volume 70 to 150 words not put.

If the essay is a retelling or completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of the check (K1-K12) is rated zero.

If the work, which is a rewritten or retold source text, contains fragments of the examinee's text, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account in the check. A work written without reference to the text read (not according to this text) is not evaluated.

GOOD LUCK TO YOU,

GRADUATES!

After checking the USE tasks in the Russian language, a primary score is given for their completion: from 0 to 57. Each task is evaluated by a certain number of points: the more difficult the task, the more points you can get for it. For the correct execution of tasks in the exam in the Russian language, from 1 to 5 points are given, depending on the complexity of the task. In this case, for an essay, you can get from 0 to 24 points.

After that, the primary score is converted into a test score, which is indicated in the USE certificate. It is this point that is used for admission to higher education. Transfer of USE points carried out using a special scale of points.

Also, according to the score for the exam, you can determine the approximate mark on a five-point scale that a student would receive for completing tasks in the Russian language on the exam.

Below is the scale of translation of USE points in Russian: Primary scores, test scores and a rough estimate.

Unified State Exam points translation scale: Russian

The minimum test score for admission to higher educational institutions in the Russian language is 36.

Primary score	Test score	Assessment
0	0	2
1	3
2	5
3	8
4	10
5	12
6	15
7	17
8	20
9	22
10	24	3
11	26
12	28
13	30
14	32
15	34
16	36
17	38
18	39
19	40
20	41
21	43
22	44
23	45
24	46
25	48
26	49
27	50
28	51
29	53
30	54
31	55
32	56
33	57	4
34	59
35	60
36	61
37	62
38	64
39	65
40	66
41	67
42	69
43	70
44	71
45	72	5
46	73
47	76
48	78
49	81
50	83
51	86
52	88
53	91
54	93
55	96
56	98
57	100