Biography. Biography Who is Yuri Mukhin

Was born in the USSR, in the Ukraine in the city of Dnepropetrovsk. Graduated from Dnepropetrovsk Metallurgical Institute in 1973. In 1973-1995 he worked at the Ermakovsky Ferroalloy Plant (Kazakhstan), occupying positions from engineer to first deputy director. Author of inventions and articles in scientific and technical journals. He did not join the CPSU. Based on his experience as a leader, he developed a new management concept called "delocracy" (1993).

He entered political activity in the early 1990s. He supported financially the editorial office of The Day (now - Zavtra). After the split in 1994 of the National Salvation Front (FNS) into FTS-1 by Ilya Konstantinov and FTS-2, Valeria Smirnova is a member of the political council of FTS-2. In 1995, the Ermakovsky plant was sold to foreigners. Yu. Mukhin came into conflict with the new owners and was forced to leave Kazakhstan and move to Moscow, where at the end of the year he founded the newspaper Duel, of which he is the editor-in-chief and constant author to this day.

Author of numerous articles, nearly three dozen books and brochures on social and historical topics. Founder of the War and Us series of books published by the EKSMO publishing house. Founder and leader of the Army of the People's Will (AVN). Founder of the Delocracy Foundation.

In his works, Yuri Mukhin appears to be a "subverter of authorities" and questions many generally accepted truths, putting forward, at the same time, his own social, historical and even philosophical theories. Some of Mukhin's ideas look more reasoned, others less, but almost all of them are actively criticized by many readers of his works. Mukhin usually agrees with criticism, which contains indications of unprincipled factual errors in particular moments, but almost never abandons the basic concepts.

He put forward his own, as well as developed others, ideas and hypotheses:

any labor in the production or non-production sphere should be evaluated not by the chief of the executor of this labor, but exclusively by the consumer;

the first president of Russia, Boris N. Yeltsin, died in 1996, and before the official announcement of his death in 2007, he was replaced by a double or twins;

polish officers at Katyn were killed by the German invaders;

Best of the day

the main reason for the defeat of the Red Army in the summer campaign of 1941 was the lack of modern communications in the Soviet troops, in contrast to the enemy;

JV Stalin was killed, at least, by refusing to provide assistance for a stroke, and LP Beria was shot without trial or investigation as a result of the conspiracy of NS Khrushchev and a number of people close to the latter;

Stalin and Beria never initiated mass repressions and opposed any lawlessness, and the repressions that took place with their undoubted participation were justified;

Stalin strove to remove the Communist Party from power and turn it into a social organization of a spiritual and educational type, like a church (spiritual order);

the order to bring the troops to full combat readiness before the German attack was given by Stalin in time - June 18, 1941, but sabotaged by the generals;

the Zionists artificially provoke the emergence of anti-Semitism in different countries in order to speed up the departure of Jews to Israel, and even collaborated with Hitler for this purpose;

TD Lysenko was right in all the basic tenets of his theory, and his opponents were pseudoscientific charlatans;

the only reason for the "Holodomor" in Ukraine and the Kuban was the destruction of draft animals (oxen) by the peasants themselves in the process of collectivization;

special services of different countries in the process of long-term corruption are turning into anti-state criminal formations;

the Americans have never landed on the moon as part of the Apollo program;

the quality of training of professional military personnel before the Great Patriotic War was low, and this, to a large extent, predetermined defeats and unnecessary losses throughout the war;

God does not exist, however, all living beings have a Spirit - the basis of animal thinking, and in humans, in addition, the Soul is the basis of human essence, and both phenomena are practically immortal, but material;

the merits of the German aces pilots during the Second World War were mostly falsified by the propaganda of Goebbels and by the pilots themselves;

the Holocaust is called into question and the idea of \u200b\u200bcooperation between "Jewish racists" and German Nazis is being developed;

katyn and muhin
alex 21.02.2009 05:00:43

It is a shame to read Mukhin's clumsy ravings about Katyn in his "Anti-Russian meanness".
Trying to make a career in protecting the reputation of Russia, he commits an anti-Russian villainy, preventing
self-cleaning of Russia from the mistakes of the past. Russia is much higher than him and does not need his protection, and thus
more at his level. Instead of persistently poisoning his country, it would not hurt for him to go to Europe or America with lectures to be buried under rotten eggs.

On March 22, 1949, an outstanding Russian writer, publicist, politician Yuri Mukhin was born in Ukrainian Dnepropetrovsk. As the author of widely discussed books and documentaries on the history of society and political issues, he has many followers and like-minded people both in Russia and abroad.

Restructuring

In the late 1980s and until the mid-1990s, he was the first to work at the Ermakovsky Ferroalloy Plant, where he proved himself to be a talented inventor, rationalizer and perfectly organized production. Yuri Mukhin was awarded the Inventor of the USSR badge for more than thirty implemented inventions, he has published a number of scientific articles. Its fundamentally new management concept, called "Delocracy", is considered very promising and promising among production organizers.

And in 1995 this plant was sold to Japanese industrialists. With the new leadership, Yuri Mukhin naturally clashed and moved to the capital of Russia, where he became the founder of the Duel newspaper and was its constant author until the moment when the newspaper ceased to exist (banned in 2009). After that he worked as editor-in-chief of the newspaper "Towards the Barrier!" (also prohibited). After 2010, the newspaper "His Names" was published.

Numerous articles in the magazine "Seven Seals" and in the newspaper "Zavtra", which the publicist Yuri Mukhin offered to his readers, provided the author with both recognition and repression. But the series in the Eksmo publishing house, founded by him, enjoys the constant interest of both comrades-in-arms and opponents of the world, which Yuri Mukhin sees and demonstrates in his works. He has the richest biography.

Leader

He was the founder and head of the "People's Will Army" - a social movement that was banned in our country in 2010. The organization came up with proposals for the adoption of laws, which spell out the direct responsibility of both the President and the Federal Assembly for the activities that they conduct, that is, the direct responsibility of the current government to its people.

It would be logical, but not everyone thought so. Although representatives of this organization were delegated to the National Assembly of the Russian Federation, the "Army of the Will of the People" was recognized as extremist and banned (2010). Then Mukhin Yuri Ignatievich headed another community - the Initiative Group for the Referendum "CALL" (For Responsible Power). As a result, on July 29, 2015, he was taken into custody. He was charged with continuing the activities of the AVN.

Defender

Yuri Mukhin represents Yevgeny Yakovlevich Dzhugashvili in the courts, defending the honor and dignity of Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, Yevgeny's grandfather. And Yevgeny Yakovlevich himself is not so simple as to choose an unworthy person for such an important matter. Dzhugashvili is a candidate of historical and military sciences, professor. Resigned as a colonel in the Soviet Army. For twenty-five years he taught the history of wars and military art at the Voroshilov Military Academy, and also worked with S.P. Korolev, was engaged in rockets and their carriers, launched them at Baikonur.

The writer Yuri Mukhin is not only a highly educated historian, but also a talented "detective", he found many proofs. For example, that Joseph Stalin died with no assistance from a stroke, and Lavrenty Beria was simply shot dead, without waiting for a trial or investigation. In his writings, the author notes that this was the result of a conspiracy by Nikita Khrushchev himself and those closest to him.

Justice

In the book "The Murder of Stalin and Beria," the author Yuri Mukhin described in detail everything "dug up" on this case: that the so-called nomenklatura was created in their own interests, but in fact the whole cult was based on the authority of the leader, deserved, by the way, both by his mind and and hard work; that repressions did take place, although not to the extent that Stalin is charged with after his death, and that these persecutions were absolutely justified.

Mukhin notes that Stalin gave the order to the Soviet troops on full readiness before the fascist attack quite in time - on June 18 - but the generals sabotaged him. Moreover, the historian Yuri Mukhin found evidence that Iosif Vissarionovich was preparing the Communist Party to be removed from power, he wanted to turn it into a kind of public organization like a spiritual order with educational functions.

Accusations

For public speaking with extremist appeals through the media Mukhin Yuri Ignatievich was convicted by the Moscow Court of the Savyolovsky District. The crime provides for part 2 punishment in the form of two years' imprisonment and a complete prohibition of work as editor-in-chief. The punishment was assigned conditionally. This is for work in the newspapers "Duel" and "Towards the Barrier!" (year 2009). Newspapers were banned, some books were included in the federal list of banned extremist materials, such as, for example, the republished six-hundred-page "brick" "It's a shame for the state" more than once.

Mukhin Yuri Ignatievich (together with his associates) was detained on the same charge - for continuing the activities of the AVN group in the form of initiative groups regarding the holding of a referendum concerning amendments to the current Constitution and the adoption of a new law designated as "For responsible government." Investigators believe that the goal was criminal: the rocking of the political situation in the country, which could lead to instability and a change of power through illegal methods. So far, the trial is underway. Yuri Mukhin (his photo is in the article) is currently in places of detention.

Key ideas

Mukhin Yuri Ignatievich criticizes in his works many generally accepted positions - both historical and philosophical, and social. Most often it looks like an ideological reaction to some kind of social inequality, that is, the concept of conspiracy theory is often included.

For example, "Delocracy" is against the bureaucracy. Mukhin Yuri Ignatievich is sure that there should not be bosses over the performer, only the consumer correctly evaluates the work. The contracting method is built on this principle - this is the option when powers are delegated. More about this in Mukhin's book "The Science of Managing People: A Presentation for Everyone", published by "Folium" in 1995 in Moscow.

About war and the Poles

Yuri Mukhin pays a lot of attention to the politics of Poland - both past and present. It is this country that he considers one of the main culprits at the beginning of World War II: the anti-Russian and aggressive policy is traditional for the governments of Poland, and at that moment it, incited by Great Britain, played the role of a catalyst.

Yuri Mukhin is also sure that the captured Poles in Katyn were killed in 1941 by the Nazis. And he quite coherently proves this in his work "The Katyn Detective". Also, many other refutations were made by Mukhin regarding the established false opinions about the course of the first half of the Great Patriotic War.

Communication and personnel

One of the main troubles, due to which there were significant losses in the Red Army in the summer of 1941, is poor communication. Mukhin thinks so (the Wehrmacht was strong in this respect). And the training of army personnel before the war was weak, which also significantly influenced the number of initial defeats and increased losses until the very end of the war.

On a pleasant note: Goebbels and the German aces pilots successfully faked most of the victories, our pilots were many times better. Mukhin wrote the book "War and We" about all this and many other things.

The best books and films by Yuri Mukhin

1. Ed. 2014 Victims of the Blitzkrieg - 320 pages of exciting exploration of this formidable strategy. The practice of "lightning war" has been radically revised. Yuri Mukhin explains the phenomena of triumphs not by the strength of the armies of the aggressor, but by the meanness or cowardice of the elites, and there were also countries that were frankly weak in military terms.

For example, Poland had an army that was practically not inferior to the Wehrmacht, and "merged" after two weeks of the war. Weak Denmark lasted one day - why? The book is both interesting and bitter to read, especially the chapters dealing with the reasons why the enemy has captured half of a huge country. What should be done so that the forty-first year does not repeat itself? Yuri Mukhin knows the answer.

2. Ed. 2013 "General's Mafia: from Kutuzov to Zhukov" - 352 pages about the Russian wars of the first, 1812, and the second - the Great War. It is considered the most controversial and sometimes "politically incorrect" of the books of Yuri Mukhin, full of forbidden truth and refutations of historical myths. Untouchable pseudo-heroes are exposed, without regard to censorship, answers to the most awkward questions are given.

Who exposed our troops at Borodino to attack, destroying Bagration's army? Why, "tell me, uncle", did they surrender Moscow to the Frenchman unnecessarily? Who is to blame that Napoleon escaped Russian captivity? What do Kutuzov and Zhukov have in common? How to expose the general's mafia, which replaces history with pure propaganda? Zhukov near Yelnya - a failure or a feat? And what about Kutuzov on the Berezina?

3. Film "Katyn Meanness", 2005, 3 episodes. Very strong work. With facts against which there are no arguments. The film is set to draw attention to the blatant Red Army advancing. 1943 year. Hitler needs Europe's support, and for that he needs to make it angry. Hence the order: to dig the graves of 1941, where the Polish officers who were shot by the Germans did not rest, and then tell the world that near Smolensk the NKVD murderer destroyed them in 1940 on the orders of the "Moscow Jews".

The human mind is designed in such a way that it cannot "grasp the immensity." As a result, people, in matters outside their sphere of competence, are forced to rely on the point of view of experts on this or that issue, which, in turn, actualizes the question of the "quality" of these same experts. Especially considering the following statements:

A person can be delusional;

A person can deliberately lie;

Lies are best absorbed when served interspersed with truth;

Most people uncritically perceive the opinion of those whom they consider to be experts and absolute authorities on a particular issue.

The above allows us to understand that one of the ways to manage social processes is to “create” such “experts” who will analyze the situation and make forecasts in the “necessary” way for their “creators”, thereby directing the flow of undesirable social processes in a safe direction.

Such experts can be identified, firstly, by following the ancient wisdom "judge not by words, but by deeds," and secondly, critical perception of any socially significant information, regardless of the degree of authority of the one who announces it.

This article is devoted to one of such "experts", Yuri Ignatievich Mukhin.

Yuri Ignatievich Mukhin suddenly gained fame and indisputable authority in those circles of Russian society that are usually called patriotic in the mid-90s of the last millennium thanks to the investigation of the Katyn case. In an atmosphere of almost widespread betrayal of Russia's interests by the powers that be, when practically everything surrendered and surrendered, when the corrupt government was ready in court to officially admit the USSR's "guilt" for the shooting of Polish prisoners of war by the Germans; it was Yuri Mukhin's “Katyn Detective”, which smashed the Polish version of events and left no stone unturned from the Polish evidence base, became the very argument that did not allow injustice to happen.

As our remarkable historian Arsen Martirosyan notes in one of his works, there have been two cases in modern Russian history when lone researchers, in the face of inactivity or outright betrayal of the official authorities, “took fire on themselves,” fighting for the interests of the country, and won:

1. William Pokhlebkin in the history of attempts to ban the USSR (by the way, and the Poles as well) from using the word "vodka" on drinks of the same name.
2. Yuri Mukhin in the history of the Katyn case.

However, in life everything flows and everything changes, and no one has canceled the wisdom "judge not by words, but by deeds." For the first time, I was forced to think about the true role of Mukhin by a quote from an article by Maxim Bochkovsky "Trotsky's case under the banner of Stalin", which, I must admit, initially shocked me:

“Mukhin is a provocateur, who has been trained for this role for a long time, who was led ... It's simple. Someone's shrewd eyes, tracked down - here is a certain Mukhin, his head is working, and then, according to the worked out scenario, about the same as it was with the LIE ... ”.

“… Agree, in Mukhin everything is reduced to the confrontation of various factions of the CPSU. At the same time, it is kept silent that revolutions, wars, perestroika - everything was planned "over the hill", in order to destroy Russia as a geopolitical rival of the West. That is, Mukhin's main screenwriter and customer was hidden! Mukhin deliberately does not notice the various hierarchies of management. It all boiled down to a fight for a place at the trough ... And if so, since there is no complete clarity, since the object that acts against Russia has remained invisible, then over time, either a remake or a new scenario of the death of Russia can be made. After all, the object is hidden, the goals are not revealed ... This is what Mukhin is. He is apparently not very happy with the role that he has to fulfill now, but obligations ... People like him “catch” well - you will not jump off ... ”

“… It's obvious. All of Mukhin's previous activities as a historian do not prevent him from helping the enemies of Russia and does not contradict his previous work. All his facts (in his books) about Stalin are built in strict accordance with certain goals and allow you to act in a similar way. And the image (and only the image) of a patriot was created for him through the courts ... "

“… Mukhin is a western project similar to Rezun. We realized a few years ago that Mukhin would end up just like that. That he is a provocateur. This was evident from the way he extensively covered some topics, and some intensely exposed the default. "

However, the following actions of Mukhin, to my deepest regret, fully confirmed the above assessment of his activities, prompted me to really "tackle" this question:

1. His signature at number 7 in support of Putin's resignation on the website “Putin Must Leave” (www.putinavotstavku.org), where Yuri Mukhin, who positions himself as a patriot, found himself in the same company with representatives of the Russian fifth column - liberals, which in itself is suggestive; for a person who positions himself as a patriot, despite all his disagreements with the authorities, simply cannot have anything in common with the outspoken enemies of the Motherland, which are the liberals. If this common thing is still found ... So, this person is not such a patriot, in fact, as he positions himself.
2. Mukhin's books "Who Really Started World War II?" and "Dangerous Secret", in which he "appoints" Poles and Zionists to be the true culprits in unleashing the war, while completely silent on the role of the Anglo-Saxons.

3. The Katyn question.

When you start researching the activities of Yuri Mukhin generally, and not on specific issues, then even such, it would seem, extremely advantageous for Yuri Ignatievich, the topic of the Katyn case does not look so unambiguous. First of all, the following fact attracts attention: all modern serious researchers of this issue, such as Vladislav Shved, come to one and the same conclusions regarding the guilt of the Germans, which Yuri Mukhin came to 15 years ago. The question involuntarily arises: and why is it necessary, in fact, to conduct repeated studies with a delay of 15 years, instead of simply relying on the results of Mukhin's research? What's in the way? And Mukhin's reputation hinders. And the point, it seems to me, is not even that Yuri Ignatievich has been in tough opposition to any government in the country for 15 years. Not that he is not a historian by training. In the end, it didn't affect the seriousness of his research. The fact is that back in the 90s, Yuri Mukhin developed a reputation for being extremely, let's say, ambiguous, and it is very risky to rely on whose opinion a person who has weight in scientific circles.

For example, on the one hand, in the 90s, Yuri Ignatievich simply brilliantly conducts a study of the Katyn case, and on the other hand, at the same time actively promotes the version that Yeltsin died, and in 1996 he was elected to the post of President of Russia his clone. Now imagine, for example, that some domestic historian, in support of the version that the Poles were shot by the Germans in Katyn, cites the evidence of Yuri Ignatievich. And in response, for example, he gets a question from his opponents: “Is this the same Mukhin who claims that Yeltsin is dead? And you base your point of view on the evidence of such a person? "

That is, we can make an unambiguous conclusion: in the 90s, Yuri Mukhin, with his study of the Katyn case, won unconditional authority in patriotic circles and at the same time, with his activities, in general, created a situation that it was impossible to use his works when protecting Russia's interests at the official level. Of course, in the 90s, the authorities would hardly have used the results of Mukhin's research, but in the early to mid-2000s, before the launch of the third de-Stalinization campaign, the situation was somewhat different. As a result, these studies have to be repeated with a delay of about 15 years.

Well, and involuntarily, the question arises: is it all by chance, especially in the light of his latest deeds?

4. The theme of the Great Patriotic War.

First of all, it should be noted that Yuri Mukhin is a person with holistic thinking - thinking that allows you to see the big picture and identify the cause-and-effect relationships of certain processes. Why am I so sure of this? Yes, simply because Yuri Mukhin, by the nature of his previous activity, is a "techie". Any "techie", by virtue of his profession, is faced with the principles "Practice is the criterion of truth" and "Performance evaluation criterion - result"... For example, I am a systems engineer - a specialist in computer networks. So, they evaluate me simply: the network works - a good engineer, it doesn't work - it's bad, and nobody is interested in the subtleties of my work. Therefore, in order to be able to solve problems, I just need to know and understand what and how the network works. The same can be observed in any other area of \u200b\u200bproduction activity. That is, both the education system and professional activity develop a holistic thinking in the "techie", which is very helpful in research activities. What Yuri Ignatievich proved in practice in his "Katyn Detective".

The study of any process can develop in the direction of:

1. "From general to particulars."
2. "From particulars to generals."

The first approach provides a higher degree of research accuracy. As for the second approach, a situation is possible here when:

1. due to the peculiarities of the thinking of a particular researcher who “does not see the forest for the trees”, the research process may become ineffective;
2. researcher purposefully confuses the situation by over-focusing on some issues and not talking about others. At the same time, he either “forgets” to link all these issues into a single “common”, or, due to omissions, gives as a result a certain distorted “general”.

If we consider Mukhin's studies on the subject of the Great Patriotic War from this angle, we can see that Yuri Ignatievich is a master of using the second approach, and it is precisely in the variant of purposeful confusion of the situation. Yes, he has many brilliant works on the topic of war:

1. debunking the myth of the "vaunted" German aces;
2. investigation of the issue of problems with communications in the Red Army;
3. debunking the myth that the troops of the Red Army did not know when the war would start, and were taken by surprise (order of June 19, 1941 for the western border military districts to increase combat readiness), and so on.

But all these are private questions that do not explain the main thing! What is the main question of the Great Patriotic War?

The main question of the Great Patriotic War is simple: what are the reasons for the catastrophe of the Red Army in 1941, despite the fact that its military potential, at least in quantitative terms, was much higher than that of the German?

To get an answer to this question, first of all, it is necessary to understand how the Red Army was going to fight in the event of an attack on the USSR, what its strategy of warfare should have been.

This is exactly the way Arsen Martirosyan went. Our remarkable historian revealed that in the fall of 1940, the General Staff, headed by Shaposhnikov, developed a war strategy approved by Stalin, based on the principle of "active defense" (in short, the war was planned to be waged on the model of the war of 1812, luring the enemy deep into countries). And this is true. After all, given the open spaces of the USSR, no human resources would have been enough to reliably protect the entire perimeter of the western border. However, as Arsen Martirosyan again revealed, as soon as Zhukov became Chief of the General Staff, the principle of "active defense" was (without agreement with Stalin) replaced by the principle of "hard defense" (not a step back), when it was supposed to repulse the enemy strike on the border , then go on the offensive and wage war on enemy territory. However, taking into account the open spaces of the USSR on the western border, a situation turned out when the Germans, having fewer troops, concentrated their strike fists on specific areas, creating an advantage in these areas, and went through the defense of the Red Army like a knife through butter.

Here, in short, is the whole answer to the main question of the Great Patriotic War.

So why is Yuri Mukhin, paying much attention to this period, so diligently avoids this main issue? And he bypasses it because many others arise with the answer to this main question:

1. who made the substitution of the principle of "active defense" for the principle of "tough defense" and in general, what is it: stupidity or betrayal?
2. how did the person who “organically hate staff work”, according to Rokossovsky's description, become the chief of the General Staff?
3. why was the order of June 19 not fulfilled in many units on bringing the troops to heightened combat readiness?

And many others. And the answers to these and subsequent questions lead to a completely different, higher level of interstate and intercivilizational relations and, in the end, reveal the centuries-old process of confrontation between the Russian civilization (Russia - Russian Empire - USSR - Russia) and the West in an aggressive the essence of the latter.

That is why Yuri Mukhin does not touch on this main issue of the Great Patriotic War. And his books and "Dangerous Secret"... But more on that later.

5. Masks dropped.

In recent years, as I wrote above, something happened that showed the true face of Yuri Mukhin:

1. His signature is in support of Putin's resignation.
2. Book "Who Really Started World War II?".
3. Book "Dangerous Secret".

Signature No. 7

1. The system of state power is the system of governing the country. History teaches us that the breakdown of the system of government plunges the country into chaos. The restoration of the management system and the accumulation of managerial experience takes many years and is accompanied by a colossal exertion of forces. That is, no matter how cumbersome and ineffective the system of governing the country, its presence is certainly better than its absence.

2. There are two ways to change the situation in the country and in the government: revolutionary and evolutionary. The essence of the first path is to demolish the control system and build a new one on its wreckage. The essence of the second is to change the existing system:

Through pressure on the authorities from the outside in order to activate the reform processes;

Through pressure on the authorities from within by penetrating into power structures.

The revolutionary path is the path of chaos, terror, tragic management mistakes and so on, as a result of which the vast majority of the country's citizens suffer. I.e, the revolutionary way of changing the situation in the country is obviously worse than the evolutionary one.

3. The most important quality of the state power system is stability. In the absence of an Idea uniting the overwhelming majority of members of society and expressed in an understandable ideology (as in today's Russia), or in the conditions of the official existence of a deliberately false and unviable ideology (Marxism in the USSR), the system of state power is not a monolith, but is a system with a clan-related basis and multidirectional interests of various groups. In such a situation, the guarantor of the stability of the system of state power is a specific person. The departure of such a person from the political arena inevitably entails the degradation of the power system, as a result of which a situation may well arise when "The upper classes cannot, but the lower classes do not want".

The peculiarity of the present moment is such that the guarantor of the stability of the Russian power system is Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin... Respectively, advocating Putin's departure, Mukhin is working to destroy Russia. This means that he can be asked the Stalinist question: "Are you a fool or an enemy?" Only now, Yuri Ignatievich does not look like a fool. Mukhin is a man of an extraordinary mind, which he proved more than once. But if he is not a fool, then who is?

"Who Really Started World War II?"

In this book, Yuri Ignatievich “appoints” the Poles as one of the hidden culprits in unleashing the war.

The peculiarities of relations between Russia and Poland are determined by two factors:

1. At one time, in the confrontation between our countries for primacy in the Slavic world, Poland turned out to be the loser side, which caused fear in the Poles towards Russia. And in historical consciousness Russia means much more for Poland than Poland for Russia. If Poland is not particularly important for us, just another hindrance to state development, then Russia for them is a state entity, which is a very strong irritant and through whose image all self-determination and all perception of history are built.
2. Polish cultural complex of messianism in relation to the entire space to the east of Poland, that is, in relation to the Russian lands. All this space, in the Polish perception, is the East - not a geographical concept, but a cultural one, which is based on the conviction of western superiority and eastern inferiority. Accordingly, domination over the East, in the Polish sense, is the duty of the West and Poland as its vanguard, its mission. That is, Russia, Ukraine and Belarus are the space of the Polish messianic debt.

As a result of the above, Poland simply could not but be an ally of Hitler in his plans to conquer the USSR. However, this is only one side of the issue.

Even now, for the most part, the overwhelming majority of the population of any human community is politically inert (except for the Jews), and before the change in the ratio of the frequencies of biological and social time, it was generally related to politics according to the principle “it's not our business”. Thus, the policy of this or that state is determined by the elites. The "quality" of the leadership of the Polish elite in their state is such that Poland has gone through several sections, but its elite has not learned anything.
And Mukhin is trying to convince that the Polish elite, offended by intelligence and with exaggerated self-importance, was playing such a subtle behind-the-scenes political game, manipulating Hitler and pushing him to war?

"Dangerous Secret".

In the book "Dangerous Secret"yuri Mukhin “appoints” Zionists as another hidden culprit in the outbreak of World War II.

Digression: on the "origin" of Zionism.

Before examining the role of Zionism in World War II, it is necessary to understand its origin, for it is far from being as unambiguous as it is now accepted to imagine. Moreover, at the origins of its appearance are not Jews at all!

It is officially believed that "Zionism is a Jewish national movement, the goal of which is to unite and revive the Jewish people in their historical homeland - Israel, as well as the ideological concept on which this movement is based", and the cause of its occurrence is supposedly the desire to return to Zion, which was always widespread among the Jews living in the diaspora. However, the question immediately arises: given that Jews have been living in the diaspora for more than one millennium, why did Zionism as an ideology emerge only in the 19th century? Especially considering the fact that Jewry has always been politically active, and the percentage of educated people in the Jewish environment has always been high?

First of all, it is necessary to understand under what conditions it was possible to widely disseminate any idea among the people (at the time of the 19th century, with its absence of the Internet).

1. The idea should "meet the aspirations" of the people, find a response in their collective unconscious.
2. The idea should be clearly expressed in the vocabulary.
3. There must be a structure in which members are purposefully engaged in spreading the idea.
4. Adequate funding of this structure is needed so that its members are not distracted by worries about "their daily bread".

Only the fulfillment of all four conditions simultaneously gave a result.

And if you study the emergence of Zionism as an ideology from these positions, then you can easily find that the threads stretch ... to the British Isles.

The policy of the British Empire was based on several principles:

1. Control of communication lines, primarily sea (Gibraltar, the Cape of Good Hope, the Suez Canal, Malta, the Falkland Islands - control over the straits from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific).
2. The policy of "checks and balances" and the struggle "by proxy." Any strong or potentially strong power of the European continent was perceived by the British as hostile, and to fight it, the British did everything to “create” a strong rival to this state, and then “knocked their heads together”. As a result of the war, there was a mutual exhaustion of the parties. The most striking example of history is the "nurturing" of Hitlerite Germany in opposition to the USSR.
3. Long-term planning, long-term work, when preparation for the implementation of certain British projects began long, sometimes decades before the start of their implementation.

In addition, in the 19th century, the British developed "The principle of ensuring the rights of small peoples of Europe"when separatist sentiments were deliberately inflamed in a multinational state, which led to an increase in social tension and a destabilization of the situation within the country - the enemy of Britain. And this principle was used by the British so actively in the 19th century that Lord Palmerston, the British prime minister, even received the nickname Lord Arsonist.

In 1859, work began in Egypt on the construction of the Suez Canal, thanks to which the sea route from Europe to Asia was simplified, that is, a node arose in the system of maritime communications that was not controlled by the British. Egypt at that time was part of the Ottoman (Turkish) Empire, which was not only a multinational, but also a multiconfessional state, and the relationship between representatives of different religions was far from good-neighborly. France was considered the formal "protector" of the Catholics of the Turkish Empire. The "defender" of the Orthodox is the Russian Empire. In order to have a reason to intervene in internal Turkish affairs with long-term plans to establish control over the Suez Canal, the British drew attention to the Jews. Well, then “miraculously” the fulfillment of the necessary four conditions occurred:

1. The idea of \u200b\u200bZion does resonate in the Jewish collective unconscious.
2. In 1862, a certain Moses Hess, who, by coincidence, played a significant role in shaping the views of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, writes the work "Rome and Jerusalem", in which he formulates the postulates that will later form the basis of Zionism.
3. For implementation "The principle of ensuring the rights of small peoples of Europe" British agents formed structures: "Young Poland", "Young Italy" and so on, in which young people of the respective nationality underwent "ideological" training, and then became distributors of separatist or revolutionary ideas within their nations. One of these structures was the organization "Young Israel"created by Giuseppe Mazzini, an Italian adventurer who was "supported" by British intelligence. Later, members of this organization stood at the origins of the creation of the Jewish lodge. B'nai Brit, which is still in force.
4. There were also no problems with funding, given the wealth of the British Empire at that time.

This was how the foundations were laid from which Zionism later grew.

As for the relationship between the Zionists and the Nazis, then, of course, their cooperation took place, and Yuri Mukhin in his book shows this well:

1. the Zionists welcomed the rise of the Nazis to power;
2. the Zionists financially supported the Nazis in the 1930s, transferring to the latter about $ 126 million (more than 2 billion in today's equivalent);
3. the Zionists, having declared war on Germany on behalf of all Jews in 1939, gave the Nazis a formal reason to imprison Jews in concentration camps as a potential fifth column, similar to what Roosevelt later did with Japanese Americans;
4. the Zionists were not at all eager to fight the Nazis even after it became known about the mass extermination of Jews on the territory of the USSR.

This is all true. But does this mean, as Yuri Mukhin claims, that the Zionists were the “hidden force” that created the conditions for unleashing a war and pushed Hitler to start it? It is safe to say that this is not the case. This is supported by the fact that after the war the Zionists could not independently achieve the creation of the state of Israel. The British and American establishment said no, and the Zionists were powerless. The key role in the creation of Israel belongs to Stalin, without whom Israel simply would not exist. The reasons why Stalin took this step is a topic for a separate article, but it is quite obvious that this was done not at all because of Stalin's special love for the Jews and not under pressure from the Zionists, but based on the interests of the USSR.

Thus, what turns out: according to Mukhin, the Zionists were so powerful that they were able to unleash the Second World War and at the same time were not strong enough to push through the creation of Israel.

Yes, the Zionists have stained themselves with collaboration with the Nazis, but it is clear that they only took advantage of the opportunity when their goals - the resettlement of Jews from Germany to Palestine, and the goals of the Nazis - for the Jews to leave Germany, coincided. After all, politics is often a messy business. But seizing the right moment is one thing, while purposeful long-term creation of conditions for organizing a war, pushing for war is quite another. Mukhin mixes these things, and mixes, in my opinion, on purpose.

Thus, it turns out that neither the Poles nor the Zionists are suitable for the role of those very behind-the-scenes "powerful of this world" who manipulated Hitler like a doll. But then one of two things is possible:

1. or the measure of Yuri Ignatievich's understanding is not high enough, as a result of which he is simply mistaken;
2. or he deliberately "casts a shadow over the fence."

It is hard to believe that Yuri Mukhin is mistaken. Firstly, because he is a man of an extraordinary mind, and secondly, because in the 21st century, historical research, first of all, by Arsen Martirosyan, and after him and Nikolai Starikov, made a real breakthrough in understanding the hidden meanings of current events and processes. Thus, the centuries-old subversive work of the West against the Russian civilization and the organization of the Second World War with the aim of destroying the USSR first of all as part of this work, the threads of which lead to Foggy Albion, ceased to be a secret. And Yuri Ignatievich must know about it.

Thus, against the background of these newest studies, Mukhin's book appears to be nothing more than an attempt to “shift the blame” for unleashing the Second World War onto the Poles and Zionists, thereby excluding the Anglo-Saxons “from under the blow”.

6. Conclusions.

1. Yuri Mukhin is a “weapon” of the second, chronological, priority of generalized controls. This person is undoubtedly smart, who did a lot of useful things, in particular, with the Katyn question. But all these useful deeds are in order to gain the trust of the patriotic part of the population of Russia, to become an authority, and then, already being an authority, purposefully distort information and, thereby, contribute to the formation of false ideas about the historical process among people.
2. It is necessary to be flexible about the work of Yuri Ignatievich. We must not forget the rule that "a lie is best absorbed when it is mixed with the truth," which means that now, when the role of Yuri Mukhin has been revealed, one should not just take and discard everything that he wrote. It is necessary to identify and use what is truly valuable and important in Mukhin's work, such as, for example, the study of the Katyn case, and discard everything that Mukhin purposefully distorts in fulfilling the role that is destined for him.