Creating your own questionnaire that differentiates manifestations of aggression and hostility, A. Bass And A.Darki identified the following types of reactions:

• physical aggression the use of physical force against another person.
• Indirect Aggression directed in a roundabout way at another person or directed at no one.
• Irritation- willingness to display negative feelings at the slightest arousal (temper, rudeness).
• Negativism- oppositional behavior from passive resistance to active struggle against established customs and laws.
• Resentment- envy and hatred of others for real and fictional actions.
• Suspicion- ranging from distrust and caution towards people to the belief that other people are planning and causing harm.
• Verbal aggression- expression of negative feelings both through the form (scream, screech) and through the content of verbal responses (curses, threats).
• Guilt- expresses the subject's possible conviction that he is a bad person, that evil is being done, as well as remorse he feels.

The following principles were used in compiling the questionnaire:

• a question can refer to only one form of aggression.
• questions are worded in such a way as to minimize the influence of public approval of the answer to the question to the greatest extent.

The questionnaire consists of 75 statements, to which the subject answers "yes" or "no".

Creating your own questionnaire that differentiates manifestations of aggression and hostility, A. Bass And A.Darki identified the following types of reactions:

• physical aggression the use of physical force against another person.
• Indirect Aggression directed in a roundabout way at another person or directed at no one.
• Irritation- willingness to display negative feelings at the slightest arousal (temper, rudeness).
• Negativism- oppositional behavior from passive resistance to active struggle against established customs and laws.
• Resentment- envy and hatred of others for real and fictional actions.
• Suspicion- ranging from distrust and caution towards people to the belief that other people are planning and causing harm.
• Verbal aggression- expression of negative feelings both through the form (scream, screech) and through the content of verbal responses (curses, threats).
• Guilt- expresses the subject's possible conviction that he is a bad person, that evil is being done, as well as remorse he feels.

The following principles were used in compiling the questionnaire:

• a question can refer to only one form of aggression.
• questions are worded in such a way as to minimize the influence of public approval of the answer to the question to the greatest extent.

The questionnaire consists of 75 statements, to which the subject answers "yes" or "no".

test material

1. At times I can't handle the urge to hurt others
2. Sometimes I gossip about people I don't like.
3. I get irritated easily but calm down quickly
4. If they don't ask me nicely, I won't do it.
5. I don't always get what I'm supposed to
6. I don't know what people say about me behind my back
7. If I don't approve of my friends' behavior, I let them feel it.
8. When I happened to deceive someone, I experienced excruciating remorse
9. I feel like I can't hit a man
10. I never get irritated enough to throw things.
11. I am always indulgent to other people's shortcomings
12. If I don't like the established rule, I want to break it.
13. Others almost always know how to take advantage of favorable circumstances.
14. I am wary of people who treat me a little more friendly than I expected.
15. I often disagree with people
16. Sometimes thoughts come to my mind that I'm ashamed of
17. If someone hits me first, I won't answer him.
18. When I get irritated I slam doors
19. I'm much more irritable than I seem
20. If someone imagines himself to be the boss, I always act against him.
21. I'm a little sad about my fate
22. I think a lot of people don't like me
23. I can't resist arguing if people don't agree with me.
24. People who dodge work should feel guilty
25. Whoever insults me and my family is asking for a fight
26. I'm incapable of rude jokes
27. I get angry when I'm mocked
28. When people pretend to be bosses, I do everything so that they do not become arrogant.
29. Almost every week I see someone I don't like
30. Quite a few people envy me
31. I demand that people respect me
32. It depresses me that I do little for my parents
33. People who constantly harass you are worth getting punched in the nose.
34. I am never gloomy with anger
35. If they treat me worse than I deserve, I don't get upset
36. If someone pisses me off, I don't pay attention
37. Even though I don't show it, sometimes I get jealous
38. Sometimes I feel like they're laughing at me
39. Even if I'm angry, I don't use "strong" language
40. I wish my sins were forgiven
41. I rarely hit back even if someone hits me.
42. When it doesn't work out my way, I sometimes get offended
43. Sometimes people annoy me just by their presence.
44. There are no people I truly hate
45. My principle: "Never trust "strangers"
46. If someone annoys me, I'm ready to say what I think of him.
47. I do a lot of things that I later regret.
48. If I get mad I might hit someone
49. Since childhood, I have never shown outbursts of anger.
50. I often feel like a powder keg about to explode.
51. If everyone knew how I feel, I would be considered a person who is not easy to work with.
52. I always think about the secret reasons why people do something nice for me.
53. When they yell at me, I start yelling back.
54. Failure makes me sad
55. I fight no less and no more than others
56. I can remember times when I was so angry that I grabbed the thing that came to my hand and broke it.
57. Sometimes I feel like I'm ready to start a fight first
58. Sometimes I feel like life is treating me unfairly
59. I used to think that most people were telling the truth, but now I don't believe it.

Analysis of the results according to the method of Bass - Darki

This technique allowed us to investigate the severity of various types of aggression in the subjects. Below you will see how many percentages of responses there were for each of the indicators.

Verbal aggression - 16%

Guilt - 32%

Physical aggression - 8%

Indirect - 20%

Suspicion - 12%

Irritation - 4%

Negativism - 0%

The highest indicators on the scales "Guilt", "Indirect aggression", and the lowest - on the scale "Negatevism".

Indirect - this is aggression, which in a roundabout way is directed at another person or at no one.

Guilt - expresses the subject's possible conviction that the subject is a bad person, that evil is being done, and that he still feels remorse.

Negativism is an oppositional manner of behavior from passive resistance to active struggle against established customs and laws.

Figure 2. Bass-Darkey results

In relationships with peers, adolescents often experience situations that make these people feel guilty or jealous. There are a number of crises and turning points at this age. Each of the crises makes a teenager think about himself and what he is. At this age, an ever wider world opens up before a person and he moves from a family to school, begins to attend clubs, sports sections, groups of classes according to his interests. Joining, leaving a group potentially carries an element of risk, but it is also an essential part of development. Adolescents are more likely to gravitate towards groups of their own age, while in childhood the main environment is their family. The experience of a teenager is to a greater extent his own experience, and not the general experience of the family, which would protect him and help in making decisions, overcoming his difficulties. He faces circumstances when he must make his own decisions. This can be stressful, because decisions are often so serious that they can even affect the rest of your life.

Directivity - 22.7%

Autonomy - 4.54%

The main thing is the psychological acceptance of parents by teenagers in a relatively critical approach to them. Teenagers often feel the need for help and support from their parents. Such forms of behavior as dominance, suspicion, tendency to leadership are denied. At this time, teenagers do not expect excessive conformism from their parents, up to the tendency to "go on about".

Figure 3. Analysis of the results according to the ADOR method

Just competent behavior, a friendly way of communication, normal emotional contacts are not enough for a teenager to claim that his mother has a bright interest in relation to this person. They strive for overprotection of a strong, adult, independent individual. This can be explained by the fact that teenagers are from a good family. The highest indicators on the scale of positive interest, directiveness.

directive scale. Teenagers see the directiveness of parents in relation to the child in the imposition of guilt on them in relation to these teenagers, their declarations, constant reminders that "parents sacrifice everything for the sake of the child", take full responsibility for weight, also what they did, does, will do child. Parents, as it were, affirm the initial dependence of parental status, the assessment of others on the compliance of the child with the “standard child”, while excluding the possibility of other options for self-expression. Thus, parents strive in any way to exclude the wrong behavior of the child, so as not to lose face. Simple forms of manifestation of responsiveness, manifestations of sympathy, causing positive emotional relationships, negatively correlate with the directive form of interaction between parents and a teenager. Smaller indicators are available on a scale of autonomy. Parental autonomy in relations with adolescents is understood by him as dictatorship, complete intoxication with power, even some mania in this regard, which does not recognize any variations. At the same time, parents who do not perceive their child as a person directly, with their feelings, thoughts, ideas, motives, are a “blind” force of power and ambition, to which everyone, no matter what, is obliged to obey. At the same time, the adaptive form of parental authority based on trust, respect, as well as acceptable forms of rigidity and harshness (when they take into account the situation), turn out to be not characteristic of the autonomy of parents in relations with teenage children. According to the opinion, neither emotional attachment nor a friendly style of communication can be associated with isolation, non-involvement of parents in the affairs of the child.

Aggressiveness can be understood as a personality trait characterized by the presence of destructive tendencies, mainly in the field of subject-subjective relations. Probably, the destructive component of human activity is necessary in creative activity, since the needs of individual development inevitably form in people the ability to eliminate and destroy obstacles, to overcome what opposes this process.

PURPOSE
The technique is designed to detect manifestations of aggressiveness in children.

The manifestation of aggression in childhood is a problem that worries teachers and parents more and more. The task of the psychologist should be psycho-correctional work with individuals who are more aggressive than others. But how to define this "more" or "less"? The answer to this question is impossible without a sufficiently precise definition of the concepts of "aggression" and "aggressiveness".

The need for such a definition is justified by the fact that the term "aggression" is extremely often used today in the broadest context and therefore needs serious "cleansing" from a number of separate meanings.

Various authors in their studies define aggression and aggressiveness in different ways: as an innate human reaction to “defend the occupied territory” (Lorend, Ardrey); as a desire for dominance (Morrison); the reaction of the personality to the surrounding reality hostile to man (Horney, Fromm). Theories linking aggression and frustration (Muller, Oak, Dollard) have become very widespread.

Aggression has qualitative and quantitative characteristics. Like any property, it has a different degree of severity: from an almost complete absence to the ultimate development. Each person must have a certain degree of aggressiveness. Its absence leads to passivity, compliance, conformity, etc. Excessive development of it begins to determine the whole appearance of the personality, which can become conflicting, incapable of conscious cooperation, etc. Aggressiveness in itself does not make the subject socially dangerous, since, on the one hand, the existing connection between aggressiveness and aggression is not rigid, and on the other hand, the act of aggression itself may not take socially dangerous and unapproved forms. In everyday consciousness, aggressiveness is synonymous with "malicious activity." However, in itself, destructive behavior does not have “malice”; it is the motive of activity that makes it so, those values ​​for the sake of achieving and possessing which activity unfolds. External practical actions may be similar, but their motivational components are directly opposite.

Based on this, aggressive manifestations can be divided into two main types; the first is motivational aggression as a value in itself, the second is instrumental as a means (meaning that both can manifest themselves both under the control of consciousness and outside it, and are associated with emotional experiences: anger, hostility). Practical psychologists should be more interested in motivational aggression as a direct manifestation of the implementation of destructive tendencies inherent in the personality. Having determined the level of such destructive tendencies, it is possible with a high probability to predict the possibility of manifestation of open motivational aggression. One such diagnostic procedure is the Bass-Darkey questionnaire. A. Basho, who adopted a number of provisions of his predecessors, divided the concepts of "aggression" and "hostility" and defined the latter as "... a reaction that develops negative feelings and negative assessments of people and events." Creating their own questionnaire that differentiates manifestations of aggression and hostility, A. Basse and A. Darki identified the following types of reactions:
1) physical aggression - the use of physical force against another person;
2) indirect - aggression, in a roundabout way directed at another person or not directed at anyone;
3) irritation - readiness for the manifestation of negative feelings at the slightest arousal (irascibility, rudeness);
4) negativism - an oppositional manner in behavior from passive resistance to active struggle against established customs and laws;
5) resentment - envy and hatred of others for real and fictional actions;
6) suspicion - in the range from distrust and caution towards people to the belief that other people are planning and doing harm;
7) verbal aggression - the expression of negative feelings both through the form (shout, screech) and through the content of verbal responses (curses, threats);
8) guilt - expresses the subject's possible conviction that he is a bad person, that evil is being done, as well as remorse he feels).

The questionnaire consists of 75 statements, to which the subject answers "yes" or "no".

INSTRUCTIONS
Read the questions in the questionnaire and answer them "yes" or "no".
Questionnaire "Bassa-Darki"
1. At times I can't handle the urge to harm others.
(Not really).
2. Sometimes I gossip about people I don't like (yes-no).
3. I get irritated easily but calm down quickly (yes-no).
4. If they don’t ask me in a good way, I won’t do it (yes-no).
5. I don't always get what I'm supposed to (yes-no).
6. I don't know what people say about me behind my back (yes-no).
7. If I disapprove of my friends' behavior, I let them feel it.
(Not really).
8. When I happened to deceive someone, I experienced excruciating remorse
(Not really).
9. It seems to me that I am not able to hit a person (yes-no).
10. I never get irritated enough to throw things.
(Not really).
11. I am always indulgent to other people's shortcomings (yes-no).
12. If I don’t like the established rule, I want to break it.
(Not really).
13. Others almost always know how to take advantage of favorable circumstances.
(Not really).
14. I am wary of people who treat me a little more friendly than I expected (yes-no).
15. I often disagree with people (yes-no).
16. Sometimes thoughts come to my mind that I am ashamed of (yes-no).
17. If someone hits me first, I will not answer him (yes-no).
18. When I am annoyed, I slam doors (yes-no).
19. I am much more irritable than it seems (yes-no).
20. If someone imagines himself to be the boss, then I always act against him
(Not really).
21. My fate upsets me (yes-no).
22. I think that many people do not like me (yes-no).
23. I can't resist arguing if people don't agree with me.
(Not really).
24. People who dodge work should feel guilty.
(Not really).
25. Someone who insults me and my family asks for a fight
(Not really).
26. I am not capable of rude jokes (yes-no).
27. I get angry when they mock me (yes-no).
28. When people pretend to be bosses, I do everything so that they do not become arrogant
(Not really).
29. Almost every week I see someone I don't like.
(Not really).
30. Many people envy me (yes-no).
31. I demand that people respect me (yes-no).
32. I am depressed by the fact that I do little for my parents (yes-no).
33. People who harass you are worth getting punched in the nose.
(Not really).
34. I am never gloomy with anger (yes-no).
35. If they treat me worse than I deserve, I don't get upset
(Not really).
36. If someone pisses me off, I don't pay attention.
(Not really).
37. Although I don’t show it, I sometimes get jealous
(Not really).
38. Sometimes it seems to me that they are laughing at me (yes, no).
39. Even if I'm angry, I don't use "strong" expressions.
(Not really).
40. I want my sins to be forgiven (yes-no).
41. I rarely fight back, even if someone hits me (yes-no).
42. When it turns out not in my opinion, I sometimes get offended (yes, no).
43. Sometimes people annoy me with their mere presence.
(Not really).
44. There are no people whom I would truly hate (yes-no).
45. My principle: “Never trust “strangers” (yes-no).
46. ​​If someone annoys me, I am ready to say what I think of him.
(Not really).
47. I do a lot of things that I later regret (yes-no).
48. If I get angry, I can hit someone (yes-no).
49. Since childhood, I have never shown outbursts of anger (yes-no).
50. I often feel like a powder keg about to explode.
(Not really).
51. If everyone knew how I feel, I would be considered a person who is not easy to work with
(Not really).
52. I always think about what secret reasons make people do something nice for me.
(Not really).
53. When someone yells at me, I start yelling back (yes-no).
54. Failures upset me (yes-no).
55. I fight no less often and no more often than others (yes, no).
56. I can remember cases when I was so angry that > ​​I grabbed a thing that came under my arm and broke it (yes-no).
57. Sometimes I feel ready to start a fight first (yes-no).
58. Sometimes I feel that life is treating me unfairly.
(Not really).
59. I used to think that most people were telling the truth, but now I don't believe it.
(Not really).
60. I swear only out of anger (yes-no).
61. When I do wrong, my conscience torments me (yes-no).
62. If it is necessary to use physical force to protect my rights, I use it
(Not really).
63. Sometimes I express my anger by banging my fist on the table.
(Not really).
64. I can be rude to people I don't like.
(Not really).
65. I have no enemies who would like to harm me (yes-no).
66. I don’t know how to put a person in his place, even if he deserves it.
(Not really).
67. I often think that I lived wrong (yes-no).
68. I know people who can get me into a fight.
(Not really).
69. I don't get upset over little things (yes-no).
70. It rarely occurs to me that people are trying to anger or insult me.
(Not really).
71. I often only threaten people, although I do not intend to carry out threats.
(Not really).
72. Recently I have become a bore (yes-no).
73. In a dispute, I often raise my voice (yes-no).
74. I usually try to hide my bad attitude towards people.
(Not really).
75. I would rather agree with something than argue (yes-no).

When compiling the questionnaire, the authors used the following principles:
1. A question can refer to only one form of aggression.
2. Questions are formulated in such a way as to minimize the impact of public approval on the answer to the question to the greatest extent.

The answer is evaluated on eight scales as follows:
1. Physical aggression:
"yes" = 1, "no" = 0: 1, 25, 31, 41, 48, 55, 62, 68; "no" = 1, "yes" = 0: 9, 17

2. Indirect aggression:
"yes" = 1, "no" - 0: 2, 10, 18, 34, 42, 56, 63; "no" = 1, "yes" = 0: 26.49

3. Irritation:
"yes" = 1, "no" = 0: 3, 19, 27, 43, 50, 57, 64, 72; "no" = 1, "yes" = 0: 11, 35.69

4. Negativism:
"yes" = 1, "no" = 0: 4, 12, 20, 28; "no" = 1, "yes" = 0:36
5. Resentment:
"yes" - 1, "no" = 0: 5, 13, 21, 29, 37.44, 51, 58

6. Suspicion:
"yes" = 1, "no" = 0: 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, 45, 52, 59; "no" = 1, "yes" = 0: 33, 66, 74, 75

7. Verbal aggression:
"yes" = 1, "no" = 0: 7, 15, 23, 31, 46, 53.60, 71, 73; "no" = 1, "yes" = 0: 33, 66.74, 75

8. Guilt:
“yes” = 1, “no” = 0: 8, 16, 24, 32, 40.47, 54, 61, 67 The hostility index includes scales 5 and 6, and the aggressiveness index (direct and motivational) includes scales 1, 3, 7.

The norm of aggressiveness is the value of its index, equal to 21 ± 4, and hostility - 6.5-7 + 3. At the same time, attention is drawn to the possibility of achieving a certain value, showing the degree of manifestation of aggressiveness.

Bassa-Darky Questionnaire

The word "aggression" is extremely often used today in the broadest context and therefore needs serious "cleansing" from a whole series of layers and individual meanings.

as a setting for dominance (Morrison); the reaction of the personality to the surrounding reality hostile to the person (Horzi, Fromm). Theories linking aggression and frustration (Muller, Oak, Dollard) have become very widespread.

Aggressiveness is understood as a property, a quality of a person, characterized by the presence of destructive tendencies, mainly in the field of subject-subject relations. Probably, the destructive component of human activity is necessary in creative activity, since the needs of individual development inevitably form in people the ability to eliminate and destroy obstacles, to overcome what opposes this process.

Aggression has a qualitative and quantitative characteristic. Like any property, it has a different degree of severity: from an almost complete absence to its ultimate development. Each person must have a certain degree of aggressiveness. The absence of it leads to passivity, statements, conformity, etc. Its excessive development begins to determine the whole appearance of the personality, which can become conflicting, incapable of conscious cooperation, etc. Aggression itself does not make the subject consciously dangerous, since, on the one hand, the existing connection between aggressiveness and aggression is not rigid, and, on the other hand, the act of aggression itself may not take consciously dangerous and unapproved forms. In everyday consciousness, aggressiveness is synonymous with "malicious activity." However, in itself, destructive behavior does not possess "maliciousness", it is the motive of activity that makes it so, those values ​​for the sake of achieving and possessing which activity unfolds. External practical actions may be similar, but their motivational components are directly opposite.

Proceeding from this, it is possible to divide the manifestations of aggression into two main types: the first is motivational aggression, as a value in itself, the second is instrumental, as a means (implying that both can manifest themselves both under the control of consciousness and outside it, and are associated with emotional experiences (anger, hostility).Practical psychologists should be more interested in motivational aggression as a direct manifestation of the implementation of destructive tendencies inherent in the personality.Having determined the level of such destructive tendencies, one can predict with a high degree of probability the possibility of manifesting open motivational aggression.One of these diagnostic procedures is the Bass-Darkey questionnaire.

A. Basho, who adopted a number of provisions of his predecessors, divided the concepts of aggression and hostility and defined the latter as: "... a reaction that develops negative feelings and negative assessments of people and events." Creating their own questionnaire that differentiates manifestations of aggression and hostility, A. Basse and A. Darki identified the following types of reactions:

1. Physical aggression - the use of physical force against another person.

2. Indirect - aggression, in a roundabout way directed at another person or directed at no one.

3. Irritation - readiness for the manifestation of negative feelings at the slightest excitement (irascibility, rudeness).

4. Negativism - an oppositional manner in behavior from passive resistance to active struggle against established customs and laws.

5. Resentment - envy and hatred of others for real and fictional actions.

6. Suspicion - ranging from distrust and caution towards people to the belief that other people are planning and causing harm.

7. Verbal aggression - the expression of negative feelings both through the form (shout, screech) and through the content of verbal responses (curses, threats).

8. Guilt - expresses the subject's possible conviction that he is a bad person, that evil is being done, as well as remorse he feels.

The questionnaire consists of 75 statements, to which the subject answers "yes" or "no".

Stimulus material of the Bass-Darky questionnaire

1. At times, I can't handle the urge to harm others. Not really

2. Sometimes I gossip about people I don't like. Not really

3. I get easily irritated but calm down quickly. Not really

4. If I am not asked in a good way, I will not do it. Not really

5. I don't always get what I'm supposed to. Not really

6. I don't know what people say about me behind my back. Not really

7. If I don't approve of my friends' behavior, I let them feel it. Not really

8. When I happened to deceive someone, I experienced excruciating remorse. Not really

9. It seems to me that I am not capable of hitting a person. Not really

10. I never get irritated enough to throw things. Not really

11. I am always indulgent to other people's shortcomings. Not really

12. If I do not like the established rule, I want to break it. Not really

13. Others can almost always take advantage of favorable circumstances. Not really

14. I am wary of people who treat me a little more friendly than I expected. Not really

15. I often disagree with people. Not really

16. Sometimes thoughts come to my mind that I am ashamed of. Not really

17. If someone hits me first, I will not answer him. Not really

18. When I get irritated, I slam doors. Not really

19. I am much more irritable than it seems. Not really

20. If someone imagines himself to be the boss, I always act against him. Not really

21. My fate upsets me a little. Not really

22. I think that many people do not like me. Not really

23. I can't resist arguing if people don't agree with me. Not really

24. People who dodge work should feel guilty. Not really

25. Whoever insults me and my family asks for a fight. Not really

26. I am not capable of rude jokes. Not really

27. I am furious when I am mocked. Not really

28. When people build bosses out of themselves, I do everything so that they do not become conceited. Not really

29. Almost every week I see someone I don't like. Not really

30. Quite a few people envy me. Not really

31. I demand that people respect me. Not really

32. I am depressed by the fact that I do little for my parents. Not really

33. People who constantly harass you are worth getting punched in the nose. Not really

34. I am never gloomy with anger. Not really

35. If they treat me worse than I deserve, I don't get upset. Not really

36. If someone pisses me off, I don't pay attention. Not really

37. Although I do not show it, I am sometimes envious. Not really

38. Sometimes it seems to me that they are laughing at me. Not really

39. Even if I am angry, I do not use "strong" expressions. Not really

40. I want my sins to be forgiven. Not really

41. I rarely fight back, even if someone hits me. Not really

42. When it doesn't work out my way, I sometimes get offended. Not really

43. Sometimes people annoy me with their mere presence. Not really

44. There are no people whom I would truly hate. Not really

45. My motto: "Never trust "outsiders". yes / no

46. ​​If someone annoys me, I am ready to say what I think of him. Not really

47. I do a lot of things that I later regret. Not really

48. If I get angry, I can hit someone. Not really

49. Since childhood, I have never shown outbursts of anger. Not really

50. I often feel like a powder keg about to explode. Not really

51. If everyone knew how I feel, I would be considered a person with whom it is not easy to work. Not really

52. I always think about what secret reasons make people do something nice for me. Not really

53. When someone shouts at me, I start shouting back. Not really

54. Failures make me sad. Not really

55. I fight no less and no more than others. Not really

56. I can remember cases when I was so angry that I grabbed a thing that came under my arm and broke it. Not really

57. Sometimes I feel ready to start a fight first. Not really

58. Sometimes I feel that life is treating me unfairly. Not really

59. I used to think that most people are telling the truth, but now I don't believe it. Not really

60. I swear only out of anger. Not really

61. When I do wrong, my conscience torments me. Not really

62. If I need to use physical force to protect my rights, I use it. Not really

63. Sometimes I express my anger by banging my fist on the table. Not really

64. I am rude to people I don't like. Not really

65. I have no enemies who would like to harm me. Not really

66. I do not know how to put a person in his place, even if he deserves it. Not really

67. I often think that I lived wrong. Not really

68. I know people who are able to bring me to a fight. Not really

69. I don't get upset over little things. Not really

70. It rarely occurs to me that people are trying to anger or insult me. Not really

71. I often only threaten people, although I am not going to carry out threats. Not really

72. Recently I have become a bore. Not really

74. I usually try to hide my bad attitude towards people. Not really

75. I'd rather agree with something than argue. Not really

Results processing

When compiling the questionnaire, the following principles were used:

1. A question can refer to only one form of aggression.

2. Questions are worded in such a way as to minimize the influence of public approval of the answer to the question to the greatest extent.

Responses are scored on eight scales as follows:

1. Physical aggression: "yes" = 1, "no" -0: 1.25.31.41.48.55.62.68, "no" =1, "yes" = 0:9.7

2. Indirect aggression: "yes" - 1, "no" = 0:2, 10, 18, 34.42, 56, 63, "no" = 1, "yes" - 0: 26, 49