Ivan Andreevich (Prince Mozhaisky). The meaning of ivan andreevich khovansky (tararui) in a short biographical encyclopedia Ivan andreevich prince mozhaisky

KHOVANSKY, IVAN ANDREEVICH(early XVII century - 1682), prince, boyar, Russian military and statesman; had the nickname "Tararui" ("chatterbox"). Descended from an old princely family, descended from Narimunt-Gleb (1277-1348), the second son of the great Lithuanian prince Gediminas; his ancestors moved from Lithuania to Moscow in 1408. He began his service under Mikhail Fedorovich as a steward. In 1650 he was appointed governor of Tula with the assignment to repel the raids of the Crimean Tatars. In 1651-1654 he was a voivode in Vyazma, in 1656 - in Mogilev. During the Russian-Polish-Swedish war, he served as a regimental commander. In 1657 he defeated the Swedes at Gdov. March 27 (April 6) 1659 received the rank of boyar. In January 1660 he took Brest and put it on fire; at the beginning of summer he laid siege to Lyakhovichi, but on June 18 (28) he was defeated by hetman S. Charnetsky near Polonka and with the remnants of the troops retreated to Polotsk. In February 1661, near Druya, he defeated and captured Colonel Lisovsky, who had betrayed the tsar. In the fall of 1661 at Kushliki, he suffered a crushing defeat from the Polish-Lithuanian army under the command of Marshal Zheromski (out of 20,000 soldiers, no more than a thousand were saved) and was recalled from Pskov.

During the Copper Riot in Moscow on July 25, 1662, he conducted negotiations with the rebels on behalf of the tsar, and after the suppression of the revolt, he headed the detective commission in the village of Kolomenskoye. In 1663 he was appointed judge of the Yamsky Prikaz. In 1669-1678 he served as a voivode in Pskov, Smolensk and Novgorod. He showed himself as a stern and despotic administrator who did not take into account local liberties and customs. In 1678-1680 he directed the defense of the southern borders of Russia from the Turks and Crimean Tatars. In 1680 he returned to Moscow and occupied a prominent position at the court. In 1681-1682 he headed the Search Order.

In April 1682, after the death of Fyodor Alekseevich and the proclamation of Peter I, the youngest son of Aleksey Mikhailovich (from N.K. Naryshkina), tsar, he joined the Miloslavsky group, removed from power. He became one of the inspirers of the Streletsky revolt on May 15-17 (25-27), 1682, after which he was appointed head of the Streletsky order by Princess Sophia instead of Prince M.Yu.Dolgorukov, who was killed by the rebels; on his initiative, the government announced gratitude and full forgiveness to the participants in the riot; a pillar was erected on Red Square with a list of the crimes of "the villains they had killed." With the support of the archers, renamed the Nadvornaya Infantry, he achieved the establishment on May 26 (June 5) of the dual kingdoms regime (joint reign of Ivan V and Peter I) and the proclamation of the regency of Sophia on May 29 (June 8).

As a secret adherent of the Old Believers, he organized a demonstration of schismatics on June 23 (July 3) 1682, forcing Patriarch Joachim to agree to a public dispute with one of the leaders of the Old Believers, Nikita Pustosvyat; however, the dispute that took place on July 5 (15) ended with the defeat of the schismatics and reprisals against their leaders.

Relying on the archers, whom he indulged in every possible way, he acquired enormous political influence; actively intervened in state affairs. In June 1682 he became the head of the Judgment Order. With his lust for power and arrogance, he pushed Sophia and the Miloslavsky party away from him and aroused the hatred of the aristocracy. In August, he came into conflict with the Boyar Duma, which rejected his proposal to introduce a tax from the palace volosts in favor of the archers. Rumors of I.A. Khovansky's intention to destroy the royal family and to ascend the throne himself prompted Sophia to take Ivan V and Peter I from Moscow to Kolomenskoye on August 20 (30), and then to the monastery of Savva Storozhevsky. On September 5 (15) by a royal decree he was declared a rebel and patron of heretics; gathered on September 17 (27) in the village. Vozdvizhensky Boyar Duma sentenced him to death. On the same day he was captured in the village. Pushkino and taken to Vozdvizhenskoye, where he was beheaded together with his son Andrey. Upon learning of the execution of the Khovanskys, the archers raised an uprising in Moscow and captured the Kremlin, but, deprived of leadership, soon submitted to the regent.

The tragic fate of I.A. Khovansky became the plot of the opera by M.P. Mussorgsky Khovanshchina.

Ivan Krivushin

Participation in wars: War with the Tatars. Hiking to Kazan Hiking against the Swedes. War for the Grand Duchy of Moscow
Participation in battles:

Appanage prince Mozhaisky (from 1432), Prince Starodubsky (from 1465)

In 1432, Prince Ivan Andreevich inherited the Mozhaisky inheritance, where he began to reign very worthily.

In 1445, Prince Ivan went on a campaign to Murom against the Tatar Khan Ulu-Muhamed... IN the battle of Suzdal the prince was wounded and barely managed to escape, while the grand duke was taken prisoner.

In the struggle between two pretenders to the throne of the Great Moscow principality, Prince Ivan Andreevich, as it was at that time, took the side of the stronger at the moment - Dmitry Shemyaka.

In 1446, Prince Ivan, by order Shemyaki, went to the Trinity-Sergius Lavra, where on February 13 he captured the Grand Duke Vasily Dmitrievich and took him to Moscow. The prince was blinded. For the service Ivan Andreevich received from Shemyaka Suzdal.

But Shemyaka's triumph was short-lived. Seeing the love of the people for the unfortunate captive prince, in 1447 Dmitry, on the advice of Ivan Andreevich, freed Vasily Dmitrievich and gave that Vologda, from where Vasily Dark moved to Tver and began to prepare an army to recapture his fiefdom from the usurper. In order to prevent him from returning to Moscow, Dmitry and Ivan approached Voloka, while Vasily Pleshcheev with a small detachment easily occupied Moscow. Upon learning of this, Ivan and Shemyaka fled to Chukhloma, and from there to the cities of Kargopol and Galich. Vasily the Dark followed them, occupying cities along the way. The rebels had no choice but to ask the Grand Duke for peace and mercy.

Vasily II promised not to take revenge on Prince Ivan for the past, but Ivan Andreevich did not trust the Grand Duke, and therefore set a condition not to come to Moscow in the absence of the Metropolitan.

Despite the agreement, Prince Ivan began to secretly negotiate with Casimir, asking him for help and promising to submit to Lithuania later. Casimir did not agree to the proposals, and Ivan again began to fight on the side of Shemyaka. While the rebels laid siege to Kostroma, Vasily II came out with an army against them. Here Ivan Andreevich again departed from Shemyakand beat Vasily II with his forehead, for which he received the city of Bezhetsky Verkh.

Vasily II did not trust the Mozhaisk prince; he hoped to weaken Shemyaka's army by taking an ally away from him; and only Dmitry Shemyaka was defeated, as Vasily II went against Ivan Mozhaisky to punish him for his fickleness. Prince Ivan fled to Lithuania with his wife, children and all his entourage. In Lithuania, Ivan Andreevich received from Kazimir the management of Chernigov, Gomel, Starodub and Lyubech. He became friends with another exile from Russia, Ivan Vasilievich Kletsky.

Krylov Ivan Andreevich

(born in 1769 - died in 1844)

Russian writer, fabulist, academician of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences. He published the satirical magazines "Mail of Spirits" and others. He wrote tragedies and comedies, opera librettos. Created over 200 fables. Member of the Society of Russian Literature Lovers.

In the memory of contemporaries I.A. Krylov remained one of the most talented fabulists and the kindest person. But speaking of him, one cannot but pay attention to the versatility of his character. On the one hand, Krylov was an incredibly hardworking and stubborn person. Born into a poor family, he managed to go a long and difficult way from a simple scribe at the office to an eminent fabulist and author of several plays. On the other hand, everyone who wrote memoirs about this man spoke of his incredible laziness. And they also recalled his various eccentricities, which included the tides of extraordinary activity that sometimes overwhelmed the old man. He could remember the most difficult trick that required virtuoso sleight of hand, or on a bet in order to play a prank on a friend, learn the ancient Greek language, or what was even more surprising: unexpectedly meeting an acquaintance on Nevsky who was going to Moscow, sit in his carriage and go on a journey. But despite such an eccentricity of behavior, Krylov was loved and respected not only by the highest circles of society, but also by the common people, since most of his works were devoted to the common people.

Ivan Andreevich Krylov was born on February 2 (13), 1769 in Moscow. His father was an army officer who had served out of the ranks, and Vanya spent his early childhood in Yaitsky town, where he served. As soon as the Pugachev rebellion began, Andrei Prokhorovich Krylov, who led the defense of the Yaik fortress, sent his wife Maria Alekseevna and his young son to Orenburg, away from hostilities. He soon retired and joined them. In 1755 Andrei Krylov got a job as an official in the chamber of the criminal court of the Tver region. Wages were scanty, and the Krylov family could barely make ends meet. In this regard, there were not enough funds for Ivan's training. Therefore, Andrei Prokhorovich taught him as best he could. He taught the boy only to read and write, and Krylov received his further education thanks to the writer Nikolai Alexandrovich Lvov, who read the poems of the young poet and saw a spark of talent in the little boy. In his youth, Ivan spent a lot of time in the house of Lvov, studied with his children and simply listened to the conversations of writers and artists who came to visit. And for the first time, the knowledge gained was enough for him. The shortcomings of fragmentary education later affected - so, in his youth, Krylov was weak in spelling, but over the years he acquired quite solid knowledge and a broad outlook, and also learned to play the violin and speak Italian.

After the death of Andrei Krylov (1778), the family lost their last income, and Ivan had to go to work as a scribe in the same court where his father used to work. Krylov's mother began to petition for a pension, but she never achieved anything. And then Ivan and Maria Alekseevna decided to continue their efforts in St. Petersburg. In 1782, the Krylov family arrived in the capital of Russia - the city on the Neva. There, they also did not succeed in achieving anything, but Ivan found a position as a clerk in the Treasury. There he worked for the next six years, combining boring clerical work with his favorite pastime - versification. When the boy was 15 years old, he wrote his first great work - the opera "Coffee House", and immediately after that two tragedies: "Cleopatra" and "Philomela". True, his first works did not possess any special literary merits.

In 1788, Krylov's mother died, and Ivan took care of his younger brother. The salary of a clerk was not enough, and Krylov decided to try writing plays for the theater. Several comic operas have come out from under his pen: "The Rabid Family", "The Writer in the Hallway". But these works did not justify the hopes of the young writer and did not bring the author either money or fame, but they helped him get into the circle of Petersburg writers. In the 1780s, the famous playwright Ya.B. Prince. But Ivan could not appreciate his patronage. Being by nature very proud, he took the Prince's good-natured banter for a mockery and, offended, broke off relations with an older friend.

Having broken with his patron, Krylov tried to continue his literary career on his own and wrote the comedy "The Pranksters", in the main characters of which it was easy to recognize the Prince and his wife. After reading the manuscript, a terrible scandal erupted by the theater management, and Ivan's relations deteriorated not only with the Princely family, but also with the theater management, on which the fate of any dramatic work depended. Having thus ended his "theatrical" career, the young writer decided to try his hand at journalism. And in 1789 he began to publish the "Mail of Spirits" magazine. Since Krylov himself was a born satirist, his magazine also had a satirical focus, albeit in a somewhat transformed form. On the pages of his publication, Ivan Alekseevich created a caricature picture of contemporary society, wrapping his story in a fantastic form of correspondence between the dwarfs and the wizard. But this idea of \u200b\u200bhis, too, was not crowned with success. After all, few are able to perceive ridicule in their address, even if it is a veiled ridicule. Thus, the publication of "Mail of the Spirits", having lasted only eight months and gaining eighty subscribers, has ceased. And Krylov decided to leave journalism for a while.

In 1790, Ivan Alekseevich finally gave up his job in the chancellery, having resigned. And two years later he again set foot on the path of journalism. In January 1792, together with his friend, the writer Klushin, he began to publish the magazine "Spectator", later renamed "St. Petersburg Mercury". And I must say that Krylov fully took into account the experience of past failures. After some time, his magazine gained quite a lot of popularity, and the greatest success for this publication was brought by the works of Krylov himself - "Kaib", "Eastern tale", "Tale of the night", "A speech of praise in memory of my grandfather", "A speech spoken by a rake in the collection fools "and" Thoughts of a philosopher about fashion. " With each new release, the number of subscribers increased. However, soon the direction of the magazine changed somewhat due to the fact that its publisher, who was alien to Karamzin's reformist work, almost completely focused on attacks towards the latter. Unfortunately, such changes had a sad effect on the fate of the printed publication, since the sharp polemic with the Karamzinists alienated readers from the "St. Petersburg Mercury".

At the end of 1793, the publication of "St. Petersburg Mercury" ceased, and Krylov left Petersburg for several years. According to one of the writer's biographers, "from 1795 to 1801 Krylov seems to disappear from us." Unfortunately, there is no exact information about this period in the life of the famous fabulist. True, some fragmentary information that has survived to this day suggests that he lived for some time in Moscow, where he played a lot and gambling cards. And then he went to wander around the province, where he stopped to stay at the estates of his friends. In 1797, Krylov left for the estate of Prince S.F. Golitsyn, where, obviously, was his secretary and teacher of his children. In his wanderings, Ivan Krylov continued to write plays, and one of them, "Triumph", was performed at the Golitsyns' home theater. Like almost all of Krylov's works, this play ridiculed the human vices of those in power. In the evil caricature of the stupid, arrogant and evil warrior Triumph, Paul I was easily guessed, who did not like the author primarily for his admiration for the Prussian army and King Frederick P. The irony was so caustic that the play was first published in Russia only in 1871.

The next few years of Ivan Krylov's life were closely associated with Prince Golitsyn. When, after the death of Paul I, Prince Golitsyn was appointed governor-general of Riga, Krylov served as his secretary for two years. In 1803 he retired again and, apparently, again spent the next two years in continuous travels in Russia and playing cards. This time was a turning point for Krylov, since it was during these years that the playwright and journalist began to write fables, which later brought him fame.

True, at first in the work of Krylov, translations or retellings of the famous French fables of La Fontaine ("The Dragonfly and the Ant", "The Wolf and the Lamb" and some others) prevailed. In 1805, while in Moscow, he decided to show several of his works to the famous poet and fabulist I.I. Dmitriev. After reading the translation of two fables: "The Oak and the Cane" and "The Legible Bride", Dmitriev praised the translation and was the first to note that the author had found his true calling. True, Krylov himself did not immediately understand this. In 1806 he published only three fables, after which he again returned to drama.

In 1807, the author released three plays at once, which gained great popularity and were successfully performed on stage. These are "Fashion Shop", "A Lesson for Daughters" and "Ilya Bogatyr". The first two plays were especially popular, each of which in its own way ridiculed the nobility's addiction to french, mods and morals, and actually equated Gallomania and stupidity, profligacy and extravagance. Plays were repeatedly staged on stage, and the Fashion Shop was played even at court. It must be said that the powerful of this world appreciated the talent of Ivan Alekseevich Krylov and subsequently more than once honored him with an invitation to dinner. True, Krylov himself was not delighted with the imperial dinners: “... the food is tasty, but not enough. I'll have to go to a restaurant in the afternoon. "

But despite the long-awaited theatrical success, Krylov decided to take a different path. He stopped writing for the theater and every year he paid more and more attention to working on fables. And gradually he began to make less and less translations, and began to find more and more independent subjects, many of which were associated with topical events in Russian life. Thus, the fables "The Quartet", "The Swan, Pike and Cancer", "The Wolf in the Kennel" became a reaction to various political events. More abstract plots formed the basis of "Curious", "The Hermit and the Bear." However, soon the fables written "on the head of the day" also began to be perceived as more generalized works. The events that gave rise to their writing were quickly forgotten, and the fables themselves turned into a favorite reading in all educated families.

It must be said that working in a new genre dramatically changed Krylov's literary reputation. If the first half of his life was spent practically in obscurity, full of material problems and hardships, then in maturity he was surrounded by honors and universal respect. The editions of his books were sold in huge print runs for that time. And here a rather interesting paradox happened to Ivan Andreevich: the writer, who at one time laughed at Karamzin for his addiction to excessively popular expressions, now himself created works that are understandable to everyone, and became a truly popular writer.

In 1809, the first book of Krylov's fables was published, in which he acted not only as a moralist, but also as an exposer of the "powerful" of this world, oppressing and tormenting the people. He subsequently published eight more books. Thus, he left to posterity nine books, including more than 200 fables.

In 1812, Krylov became the librarian of the newly opened Public Library. Moreover, this position came to his liking. Krylov turned out not only to be a good collector of books, the number of which greatly increased during his reign, but also worked a lot on compiling bibliographic indexes and the Slavonic Russian dictionary. He did not forget and creative work... Ivan Andreevich was constantly looking for new subjects for his fables. And he looked for them among the people. According to a contemporary, he "attended with particular pleasure the people's gatherings, shopping areas, swings and fistfights, where he pushed between a motley crowd, listening with greed to the speeches of commoners." Up to his very old age, this multifaceted and talented person continued to educate himself: he studied ancient Greek, took English lessons. Thanks to his talent and attitude towards people, Krylov became a popular favorite. He was appreciated and accepted even in the most distant literary circles. According to some reports, even the great Russian poet A.S. Pushkin shortly before the duel; he, according to some sources, was the last one who said goodbye to the body of the great poet at the funeral service.

On November 9 (21), 1844, at the age of 75, Krylov died. Buried in St. Petersburg. After the death of I.A. Krylov, the tsarist government ordered to erect a monument to the great fabulist in St. Petersburg: Krylov sits on a small pedestal, and the heroes of his fables are located around him. The monument has survived to this day.

This text is an introductory fragment. From the book of 100 great composers the author Samin Dmitry

Nikolai Andreevich Rimsky-Korsakov (1844-1908) Nikolai Andreevich Rimsky-Korsakov was born on March 18, 1844 in Tikhvin. Father, composer Andrei Petrovich, came from an old noble family. His ancestors held prominent positions in the army and administration, starting with his great-great-grandfather

From the book of 100 great Cossacks author Shishov Alexey Vasilievich

Dmitry Efimovich Kuteinikov 2nd (1766 or 1769-1839 or 1844) General of the cavalry. Punished Ataman of the Don Army In the ataman field of the Great Don Army, representatives from the old Cossack family of the Kuteinikovs flashed twice. Flashed so that military history

From the book Literary reading author Shalaeva Galina Petrovna

Krylov Ivan Andreevich (1769–1844) fabulist, prose writer, playwright, journalist Ivan Andreevich Krylov was born in Moscow into the family of a retired captain. He received a meager education, but from childhood he had a thirst for knowledge. He read a lot. Persistence and perseverance have borne fruit:

From the book of Aphorisms the author Ermishin Oleg

Ivan Andreevich Krylov (1796-1844) writer, fabulist The trouble is, if a shoemaker starts to bake the pies, And the cake-maker will wear boots. Being strong is good, being smart is twice as good. If the head is empty, then the head of the mind will not be given space. And many find happiness Only by what is good for the author of TSB

From the book of 100 famous Muscovites author Sklyarenko Valentina Markovna

Krylov Ivan Andreevich (born in 1769 - died in 1844) Russian writer, fabulist, academician of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences. He published the satirical magazines "Mail of Spirits" and others. He wrote tragedies and comedies, opera librettos. Created over 200 fables. Member of the Society of Amateurs

From the book Big Dictionary of Quotes and Expressions author Dushenko Konstantin Vasilievich

KRYLOV, Ivan Andreevich (1769–1844), fabulist 806 Like a Squirrel in a Wheel. "Squirrel" (1833)? Krylov, s. 242 807 Not so many<…> With the mind of people - they are afraid, And they tolerate fools with them more willingly? Razors (1829)? Krylov, s. 223 808 Where the shepherd is a fool / There are fools too. The Wolf and the Little Wolf (1811)? Krylov, s.

From the book Dictionary of Aphorisms of Russian Writers author Tikhonov Alexander Nikolaevich

KRYLOV IVAN ANDREEVICH Ivan Andreevich Krylov (1769 / 1768–1844). Russian poet, writer, playwright, fabulist. The most famous fables are "The Wolf and the Lamb", "The Crow and the Fox", "Casket", "The Frog and the Ox", "The Dragonfly and the Ant", "The Elephant and the Pug", "The Elephant in the Voivodeship", "The Rooster and the Pearl

Miroslavsky Ivan Andreevich
(July 21, 1874 - February 26, 1933)

By the fall of 2013, I knew practically nothing about my great-great-grandfather, Ivan Andreevich Miroslavsky. First and last name without patronymic, approximate place of residence (Vologda Oblast), the number of brothers and sisters (without names) and the fact that he was a priest who was shot - that's all the information about him.
I stumbled upon this site by chance and was both shocked and inspired by communication with Irina. This note was compiled on the basis of partly materials collected by the author of the site, and partly on the basis of materials and memoirs that I, Ivan Andreevich's great-great-granddaughter, managed to collect over the past 1.5 years.
The Russian expression "Ivan, not remembering kinship" characterizes the Russian person very well. And this is not a good characteristic. A man without roots is like a dying tree. I would like to wish everyone to learn as much as possible about their ancestors, not to forget them. Then both their life and yours will not sink into oblivion, but will be an example for future generations, will strengthen their families, help to understand themselves.
So, according to church documents - priest Ioann Andreevich Miroslavsky, was born the second child on July 21, 1874, in the churchyard of Sorovo, Kirillovsky district, in the family of the priest Andrei Alexandrovich Miroslavsky. The family was large, 9 sons and 1 daughter. The main business of the family was beekeeping.
In No. 16 for 1899 of the Novgorod Diocesan Gazette there is the following information: “A visit by His Eminence Theognost, Archbishop of Novgorod and Starorussky, Belozersk and the surrounding parishes in June.
“On June 18, Vladyka visited the Zabolotsk parish 10 versts from the city of Belozersk ... Upon leaving the church, Vladyka honored a visit to the house of St. Andrey Miroslavsky, who has his own apiary and has deigned to eat tea with fresh honey here ”.
Subsequently, both Ivan Andreevich and his brother Mikhail were engaged in beekeeping. My great-grandmother, Elizaveta Ivanovna, said that she "grew up on honey." This is also confirmed by the now living grandson of Mikhail Andreevich Miroslavsky - Miroslavsky Valery Mikhailovich.
In 1896 Ivan Andreevich graduated from the course of the Novgorod Theological Seminary in the first category, with the title of a student. Until 1897, he was an overseer at the Belozersk Theological School. Then he taught for one year at the Shuzhbolensk second-class school.
In June-July 1898 he married an orphan, Maria Nikolaevna Krasovskaya (born on July 18, 1880), who was raised by the previous priest of this parish, Mikhail Evgrafievich Sokolov (died in 1897)
Dedicated on August 2, 1898 to the rank of priest to the Mother of God of the Nativity Shuzhbolenskaya Church of the Belozersk district by His Eminence Theognost, Archbishop of Novgorod and Old Russian. The children were born in marriage: Elizabeth (September 2, 1900) and Vsevolod (April 22, 1905). According to information for 1916, it appears that Elizaveta studied at the Tsarskoye Selo school of girls of clerical rank, and Vsevolod - at the Tikhvin spiritual school. The life of Vsevolod Ivanovich ended, judging by the memoirs, very tragically. "He was killed by a mob of maddened, dark people." It was not possible to find any information confirming this fact, but it was not possible to find out about his life. Most likely, he really died. I will tell you about the life of Elizaveta Ivanovna below.
Now, about Ivan Andreevich. First, "dry facts".
FROM 1900 Mr. he was the assistant dean.
1903 year - by the resolution of His Eminence No. 1947 of March 18 for diligent service and excellent conduct was awarded a legguard.
Resolution of His Eminence from December 1, 1904 year, His Archpastoral blessing was given for the zealous and successful fulfillment of the teaching duties in the Shuzhbolensk school.
IN 1907 g., 1909 g., 1911 was elected as a deputy to the diocesan congress.
1908 year - by the resolution of His Eminence No. 2436 of April 4 for excellent and diligent service on the day of Holy Easter was awarded a skufia.
IN 1909 was elected as a deputy to the Belozersk Theological School.
June 24-30 1913 - the head of psalmistic courses held at the Shuzhbolensky church.
February 24, 1914... was appointed acting dean of the 4th district of the Belozersk district.
On March 27, 1914 he was awarded a kamilavka.
Deputy of the Diocesan Congress held April 18-29, 1914 of the year.
Law teacher at the Dubininsky school of the Belozersk district
1916-1918 - Member of the Board of the Kirillovsky Theological School.
Deputy of the congress of clergy and laity, held May 25 - June 10, 1917 of the year. He worked in the commissions for the Emergency Fund and on local issues.
IN 1918 After the Revolution of 1917, he was deprived of voting rights.
At the end 1920 -x years dispossessed, acquires the status of a dispossessed.
1930 a year - we are tried for serving a prayer service in the building of the village council.
February 23, 1931 was arrested. Charged under Articles 58-8, 58-10, 58-13 of the Criminal Code.
In an extract from the minutes of the meeting of the OGPU PP troika in the LVO from 09/08/1931 g... indicated:
"It was decided: MIROSLAVSKY Ivan Andreevich - to be imprisoned in a concentration camp for a period of FIVE YEARS, counting the period from 23.2.1931. The case must be filed in the archive."
Miroslavsky Ivan Andreevich did not plead guilty to the very end.
09 September 1931 was convoyed to the SLAG OGPU (Kem).
He served his term in the Belbaltlag of the NKVD, in the Shavan camp point. He was a digger. The data from the workday credit cards of prisoners, including great-great-grandfathers, are shocking. People worked seven days a week on the hardest jobs, on one-time meals, in any weather. Not surprisingly, in the last months of his life, Ivan Andreevich gave up badly, was in the camp infirmary, and still in the same workday card there was a "diagnosis": weakness, senile weakness. Despite the fact that his age was not so great for a man: only 58-59 years old.
There is also an extract from the minutes of the meeting of the OGPU Collegium (judicial) dated January 20, 1933 on the review of the case of Ivan Andreevich. It was decided: "To release Miroslavsky Ivan Andreevich EARLY, and to send through the PSSPU to Sevkrai for the remaining term." (I.e. until 01/25/1936).
Most likely, even if he had survived, the term would not have ended there, and just like in the case of his brother Mikhail, they would have added a few more years or would have been shot.
February 26, 1933 Mr. Ivan Andreevich died of a cerebral hemorrhage.
04 April 1989 Miroslavsky I.A. rehabilitated by the prosecutor's office of the Vologda region.
The place of his burial still remains unclear because the camp cemeteries have not survived to this day on the territory of the Republic of Karelia. Although, there is still hope to find this place. In 2013, unmarked burials were found in Shavan.
What else remains to be said about the tragedy of his life? From the minutes of his criminal case, it became clear that in 1918 his wife left him. First, to study for obstetric courses in Leningrad, and 10 years later, an official divorce followed. All these years, my wife lived separately. She survived it for only 7 years. She died on January 12, 1940. She was buried at the Volkovsky Orthodox cemetery.
Their daughter, Elizaveta Ivanovna, sent parcels to her father, and she came to her mother with children in Leningrad. Her husband saw his father-in-law, Ivan Andreevich, only once. His only characteristic were the words: "A worthy man."
His words in the interrogation report about his future are also interesting: “I was going to go there to see her (meaning to my daughter, to Armenia), but they didn’t give me a passport. Therefore, he did not go to her. If I am healthy, then I will go to her when I have acquired secular clothes. " After spending more than a month and a half in the isolation ward from the moment of detention, he still could not believe that a person could be sent to prison on denunciations related to the events of twenty (!!!) years ago! It turns out that in his house in 1910, without his consent, 4-5 guards were quartered for three days (police representatives identifying the revolutionaries).
I was also pleased with the scant recollections of my distant relatives along the Miroslavsky line, whom I found in the same last year and a half of my searches. Despite the fact that the family was actually destroyed, scattered in different regions, and sometimes even countries, the relatives did not communicate with each other and did not even know about the existence of new generations of Miroslavsky, nevertheless, a couple of words about my great-great-grandfather. Valery Mikhailovich always knew that Ivan Andreevich was "a great man, a priest in the Novgorod province" (not entirely true, but still happy with me). And one of Pavel Andreevich's daughters, Antonina, said that "they had a portrait of Ivan Andreevich" (where and which portrait the story is silent about, because of Antonina Pavlovna's age. This year she is 95).
This is, perhaps, all that is known about my great-great-grandfather. I hope that now his soul will calm down, because they know about him and remember about him.
As for the fate of his descendants, here, of course, you can tell a lot and for a long time, but this is a slightly different story.
As I wrote above, there is nothing special to say about Ivan Andreevich's son, Vsevolod. It is not even known whether he managed to get married and have children. Theoretically, by age, he could, because the crowd tore him to pieces in about the mid-20s of the last century, i.e. He was already 20 years old. And practically no hints of his life remained.
After graduating from the theological school, Elizaveta Ivanovna entered the Petrograd Pedagogical Institute, but did not manage to finish her studies. As the daughter of an “enemy of the people” and a “minister of the cult,” she was actually exiled to Transcaucasia, to Armenia. You can imagine what kind of horror it was for a young Russian girl. They sent her, of course, not to the capital, but to such a distant village, to which it took two days to get on oxen. There, in the village of Makrovak, she met her future husband, perhaps the most educated man in those places, a widower with two sons in her arms. Her husband's name was Saak Egorovich Sargsyan.
In marriage, they had three children: in 1932, their daughter Nina, in 1934, their son Yuri (my dear, beloved grandfather) and in 1936 their youngest son, Vyacheslav.
At the beginning of the 30s, their family moved to the Leningrad region, to the Siverskaya station, where they worked in the Siversky colonial sector: Saak Yegorovich as a farm manager, Elizaveta Ivanovna as a teacher or educator for juvenile offenders.
In 1941 the war broke out. The husband was called, she and her three children were left alone. She was hijacked, survived with her children hunger, cold, and inhuman deprivation, humiliation, all documents were burned, and most importantly, the photo album of her family, the Miroslavsky family was lost. The only memory she has of her previous life. Her children often found themselves on the brink of destruction, because outwardly dark-eyed and black-haired reminded the fascists of "Jews". But the Caucasians were not considered much better either. But even with such a hard life, the great-grandmother remained a Man. From the stories that my grandfather told me, I know that Elizabeth more than once saved a young girl, a Jewish woman, Polina, from certain death, who was driven with them from Pushkin. She always testified that Polina was not a Jew, but an Armenian, with whom they came together from Yerevan. At some stage of this "run", in Belarus, Polina left with the partisans. Several times Elizabeth rescued, turning a blind eye to the incredible risk and danger to her life and the lives of her children, wounded soldiers and partisans. She hid them in her home, nursed and fed them.
The husband was captured by the Germans, was released, but in his homeland he was transferred first to a filtration camp, and then to a camp where he served his term. The family has not seen him for 14 years. During this time, children grew up.
After the war, Elizaveta Ivanovna with her children arrived in Yerevan, where by that time their house and all property had been plundered. She got a job as a teacher, and then as a teacher, in the orphanage number 48 evacuated from the besieged Leningrad. We lived there. What else to say? The students loved her very much. Both Armenian and Russian children, she guided many on the "true path." Many students wrote letters to her all their lives, came to visit on occasion. One of the dysfunctional students, having become a big man, some kind of minister of the Armenian SSR, even made a documentary, in which he gave a big place to Elizaveta Ivanovna, to whom, according to him, he owed most of all his current position.
She also brought up her 5 grandchildren. She died on August 17, 1974, as did both her parents, from a stroke. She was buried in Yerevan.

Documents:
- GANO, F.480, Op. 1, D. 4282, L. 120 ob.-121.
- Archival criminal case No. P-13559 against IA Miroslavsky
- Archival personal file of the prisoner Belbaltlag of the NKVD KASSR Miroslavsky I.A.

"Eternal Divisional Commander".

Born on 18 (30) .04.1893 in the village of Bogoryak, Yekaterinburg district, Yekaterinburg province. Russian, from the peasants.

In the Red Army since 1918. Since 1917, a member of the RSDLP (b).

Graduated primary school, agricultural school (1909), secondary educational institution (external), Chistopol school of ensigns (1916), VAK at the Military Academy of the Red Army (1922), Special Faculty of the Military Academy of the Red Army named after M.V. Frunze (1936).

Since 1910, a worker at a distillery, head of a dairy farm at a farm. In 10.1914 he was called up for military service (108th infantry reserve battalion; Yekaterinburg). He graduated from the training team (1915), as an external student he held an exam for a secondary educational institution. Juncker of the Chistopol school of ensigns. Ensign of the Army Infantry (09.1916). Junior officer (105th Infantry Reserve Regiment; Orenburg). Member of the First World War on the Southwestern Front: junior officer, head of the pedestrian reconnaissance team of the regiment, commander of a company and battalion (51st Siberian Rifle Regiment of the 13th Siberian Rifle Division; from 10.1916). Lieutenant. For military distinction he was awarded the Order of St. Anna, 4th class. with the inscription "For Bravery" and the officer's St. George's Cross. After the February bourgeois-democratic revolution of 1917, he was elected chairman of the company, a member of the regimental and divisional committees. From 04.1917 (according to other sources - from 08.1917) a member of the RSDLP (b). After being discharged to the reserve for the demobilization of the army, he was engaged in the establishment of Soviet power on the ground in the Urals, the Socialist-Revolutionary authorities were arrested and sentenced to death, which they managed to avoid due to escape from custody. From 01.1918 he was in the Red Guard.

In the Red Army from 05. 1918. Member of the Civil War on the Eastern and Western (near Petrograd) fronts.

Commander of the 3rd Ekaterinburg 03.1919) regiment (from 05.1918). Commander of the 3rd brigade of the 4th Ural and 2nd rifle divisions (from 09.1918). Commander of the 3rd brigade of the 29th rifle division (from 03.1919). Vreede chief of the 62nd Infantry Division (from 02.1920). Assistant to the cash manager, head of the West Siberian sector of the VOKhR (from 05.1920). Chief of the 21st Perm Rifle Division. He was wounded in battles.

Student of the Higher Attestation Commission at the Military Academy of the Red Army (1921-22). Commander of the 57th Yekaterinburg Rifle Division (Yekaterinburg.) Of the Volga Military District. Commander of the 32nd Saratov Rifle Division (Saratov) of the Volga Military District (from 08.1923). In the reserve of the Main Directorate of the Red Army (from 05.1924). Since August of the same year - commander of the 36th Trans-Baikal Infantry Division (Chita) of the Siberian Military District (from 08.1924). Commander (from 03.1926) and military commissar (from 09.1926) of the 2nd Priamurskaya rifle division (Blagoveshchensk) of the Siberian Military District, from 08.1929, the Special (from 01.1930, Red Banner) Far Eastern Army. He took part in hostilities on the Chinese Eastern Railway with White Chinese in 1929. Chief of supplies (from 11.1930) and assistant to the commander of troops (from 02.1932) of the Caucasian Red Banner Army for material support. Commander and military commander of the 3rd kolkhoz rifle division of the Special kolkhoz corps OKDVA (from 03.1932). Student of the Special Faculty of the Military Academy of the Red Army named after M.V. Frunze (1934-1936). He was seconded to the Central Council of the USSR Osoaviakhim as a responsible organizer. Senior inspector of the USSR Osoaviakhim (1937).

Military ranks:
Lieutenant;
division commander (02.17.1936).

He was awarded three Orders of the Red Banner (2-1922, 1930).

Arrested on 01.08. 1937 by the Military Collegium The Supreme Court USSR 25.04. 1938 on charges of participating in a military conspiracy sentenced to death. The verdict was carried out on the same day. By the definition of the Military Collegium dated 03.08.1957 (according to other sources - 06.07.1957) he was rehabilitated.

From the order of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Republic No. 75 of March 13, 1922: “The former commander of the 3rd brigade of the 29th rifle division, comrade A. Onufriev Ivan Andreevich for personal courage shown by him in many battles on the Eastern Front in 1919. Comrade Onufriev at the head of the units of his brigade, which made a hundred and twenty verst transition to st. Zyatitsy, May 21 of the same year
entered into battle with the enemy, defeated him and captured two battalions of white and 14 machine guns. On July 8 and 26 of the same year, in the battles near the cities of Glazov and Perm, the aforementioned comrade, showing outstanding energy and courage, carried away the units subordinated to him in successful ... battles with the enemy and forced the latter to a hasty retreat from the named cities and at the same time abandoning our in the hands of over 10,000 prisoners, 100 machine guns and many other military equipment. "

Notes: 1. Discrepancies in the sources do not allow to fully restore the order of I.А. Onufriev in the Red Army during the Civil War. 2. According to the Cherushevs' handbook, he graduated from the Courses for one-man commanders at the Military-Political Academy of the Red Army named after N.G. Tolmacheva (1931).