Morphological analysis of the union as. Morphological analysis of the union. Types of subordinating conjunctions

Unions should be distinguished to, also, also, but from combinations of pronouns something and adverbs So with a particle or a preposition, cf.:

I want you to give me advice. - What would you advise me?

I also want to go there. - I think the same (same).

I also want to go there. - I think the same.

The book is difficult but interesting. - Hide behind that tree.

The union is disassembled according to the following scheme:

2. Permanent signs:

immutable,

Rank by value,

simple/composite,

What connects.

Sample morphological analysis of the union:

We all jumped up from our chairs, but again a surprise: the noise of many steps was heard, which meant that the hostess had not returned alone, and this was really strange, since she herself appointed this hour.

(F. M. Dostoevsky)

but- union, immutable, coordinative, adversative, simple, connects parts complex sentence.

what- union, immutable, subordinating, explanatory, simple, immutable, connects parts of a complex sentence.

a- Union, immutable, coordinative, adversative, simple, immutable, connects parts of a complex sentence.

because- union, immutable, subordinating, causes, compound, connects parts of a complex sentence.

Particle

Particle- this is service unit speech, which serves to express the shades of the meanings of words, phrases, sentences and to form the forms of words.

In accordance with this, particles are usually divided into two categories - semantic and formative.

Particles do not change, are not members of the sentence.

In school grammar, however, it is customary to emphasize the negative particle not along with the word to which it refers; especially for verbs.

To formative particles include particles that serve to form the forms of the conditional and imperative mood of the verb. These include the following: would(conditional mood indicator), let, let, yes, come on (those)(indicators of the imperative mood). Unlike semantic particles, shape-forming particles are components of the verb form and are part of the same member of the sentence as the verb, they are underlined with it even in a non-contact arrangement, for example: I wouldn't be late if it hadn't rained.

semantic particles express the semantic shades, feelings and attitudes of the speaker. According to the specific meaning they express, they are divided into the following groups:

1) negative: not, not at all, not at all, not at all;

2) interrogative: really, is it, is it (l);

3) index: here, out, this;

4) clarifying: exactly, just, exactly, exactly, exactly;

5) restrictive excretory: only, only, exclusively, almost, exclusively;

6) exclamatory: what the, well, how;

7) amplifying: even, not, after all, after all, after all, well;

8) with the meaning of doubt: hardly; hardly.

In some studies, other groups of particles are distinguished, since not all particles can be included in these groups (for example, supposedly, supposedly).

Particle neither acts as a negative in the constructions of an impersonal sentence with an omitted predicate ( There's no sound in the room) and as an intensifier in the presence of an already expressed negation ( There is no sound in the room). When repeating a particle neither acts as a repeating coordinating conjunction ( There are no rustles or other sounds in the room.).

semantic particle - then must be distinguished from the word-forming postfix - then acting as a means of forming indefinite pronouns and adverbs. Compare: some, somewhere(postfix) - I know where to go(particle).

Postfixes are not particles - Xia (-camping), something, something, something and prefixes not and neither as part of negative and indefinite pronouns and adverbs, as well as participles and adjectives, regardless of continuous or separate spelling.

Morphological analysis particles

Particles are disassembled according to the following scheme:

1. Particle.

2. Grammar signs:

immutable,

Rank by value.

According to school grammar, all particles, both semantic and formative, should be disassembled according to this scheme, however, it should be noted that the formative particle is a component of the verb form and is written out during morphological analysis together with the verb when parsing the verb as a part of speech.

Sample morphological parsing of a particle:

I do not claim that he did not suffer at all; I was now completely convinced that he could go on about his Arabians as much as he liked, giving only the necessary explanations.

(F. M. Dostoevsky)

not - particle, immutable, semantic, negative.

only - particle, immutable, semantic, restrictive-excretory.

only- particle, immutable, semantic, restrictive-excretory.

According to school grammar, this sentence should also parse the particle would in the following way:

would- particle, immutable, formative, serves to form the form of the conditional mood of the verb.

Interjection

Interjection is a special part of speech that does not belong to either the independent group or the service group.

Interjection- this is a part of speech that combines words that express feelings, an impulse to action, or are formulas of verbal communication ( speech etiquette).

This definition, which corresponds to the description of interjections in linguistics, is reflected in complex 3. Complexes 1 and 2 define an interjection as a group of words expressing feelings or an impulse to act.

According to the meaning of interjections, there are three categories:

1) emotional interjections express, but do not name feelings, moods (joy, fear, doubt, surprise, etc.): oh, oh-oh-oh, alas, my God, fathers, these are the times, thank God, no matter how, fu and etc.;

2) imperative interjections express motivation for action, commands, orders: well, hey, guard, kitty-kitty, out, shoo, march, whoa, come on, shh, ay;

3) etiquette interjections are formulas of speech etiquette: hello, hello, thank you, please, excuse me, all the best.

Interjections do not change, are not members of a sentence (in a sentence All around heard only oohs and aahs the words ooh and ooh are not interjections, but nouns), except when they act as a noun (in the subject meaning): A voice echoed through the forest.

Interjections are separated by a comma or an exclamation mark. : Ba! All familiar faces! (A. S. Griboyedov)

Interjections can be derived ( fathers, sir) and non-derivatives ( ooh fu), including borrowed ones ( that's it, bis, stop, cheers, coven).

Interjections should not be confused with onomatopoeic words. This group of words is outside the parts of speech, they convey the sounds of living and inanimate nature: meow, kar-kar, ding. Onomatopoeia are outside the classification of words by parts of speech.

Interjections should also be distinguished from verbs in the interjective form: And the bam hat is right on the floor.

At parsing interjections indicate its immutability and category: emotional, incentive, etiquette. For example:

- Oh, my God, I'm not talking about that at all ...

(F. M. Dostoevsky)

My God- interjection, immutable, emotional, is not a member of the sentence.

Interjections are not analyzed in any of the educational complexes.

Ranks of unions by meaning and structure. Morphological analysis of the union.

Lesson Objectives:

1) the formation of the ability to talk about the union,

2) find conjunctions in text

3) correctly determine the categories of unions,

4) learn to parse the union.

Lesson type: repetition and consolidation of the studied material.

Equipment:

textbooks,

notebooks,

Pens,

Pencils.

During the classes:

1)Organizing time:

Teacher:

Hello guys. Sit down. Today we will repeat with you the two previous topics and analyze a new one.

2)Checking homework.

3)Front poll:

Teacher:

What union?

Student:

- Union- this is a service part of speech that connects homogeneous members or simple sentences within the complex.

Teacher:

What is the function of conjunction in a sentence?

Student:

Connect homogeneous members or simple sentences as part of a complex one.

Teacher:

What service parts of speech do you know?

Student:

Particles, prepositions, interjections.

Teacher:

What part of speech have you already learned?

Student:

Pretext.

Teacher:

What do prepositions and conjunctions have in common?

Student:

They are not members of the proposal, do not change.

Teacher:

In the last lesson, we examined the table "Ranks of unions by value." Let's repeat it. So, what two groups are unions divided into?

Student:

Unions are divided into two large groups - coordinating and subordinating.

Teacher:

What groups are coordinating conjunctions divided into. Give examples.

Student:

Coordinating conjunctions are divided into: connecting (for example, and yes(in meaning and), also, also); adversarial (eg. but, but, but, yes(in meaning but), but), separating (for example, not only…but also, or…or, either…or).

What groups are subordinating conjunctions divided into?

Student:

Subordinating conjunctions are divided into two groups - explanatory and adverbial.

Teacher:

Give examples of explanatory conjunctions.

Student:

- What, because, as if.

Teacher:

What subgroups are adverbial conjunctions divided into? Give examples.

Student:

Subordinating conjunctions are: temporary ( when), target ( to), causal ( because), concessive ( although), consequences ( so), conditional ( if), comparative ( as if).

Teacher:

The discharges of which part of speech, previously studied, remind you of the discharges of conjunctions?

Student:

Classes of adverbs.

Teacher:

In the last lesson, you were given information on record. What are other unions? Give examples, use in a sentence.

Student:

Single (used once. For example, “Small scientist,but pedant"), repetitive (for example, and...and, or...or, neither...nor"You can't see through the rainneither seas, neither sky"), double (their components are interconnected. For example, how…and, not only…but also, if…then. Pushkin created his workshow in verse, so in prose).

Teacher:

What unions do you know in structure?

Student:

By structure, unions are simple and compound.

Teacher:

What is the difference?

Student:

Simple unions consist of one word, and compound ones of two or more.

Teacher:

Give examples of simple and compound unions.

Student:

Simple conjunctions: a, but, and, but. Composite: because, since, not only ... but also.

Teacher:

What service part of speech has the same structure?

Student:

Pretext.

4) Performing morphological analysis.

Teacher:

We carry out a morphological analysis of unions (at the blackboard and in notebooks).

« Plan for the morphological analysis of the union " .

I. Part of speech.

II . grammatical role.

III . Morphological features:

1) coordinating / subordinating;

2) single/repeated/double;

3) simple / composite.

IV . The unchangeable word.

Teacher:

We write down the sentence (we do work in a notebook, one student works at the blackboard), we perform a morphological analysis of the union:

"I heard about the blizzardsand knew, what whole convoys were carried by them ”().

I. And- union.

II . Heard and knew.

III. Morph. confession:

1) op.;

2) single;

3) simple.

IV. Unchanged word.

I. What- union.

what?

II. […], (what…)

III. Morph. confession:

1) sub., explanatory;

2) single;

3) simple.

IV. Unchanged word.

Teacher:

Let's make another suggestion:

The market was full of peoplebecause it was Sunday."

I. because- union.

why?

II . […], (because…)

III. Morph. confession:

1) subordinate, circumstantial, reasons;

2) single;

3) composition.

IV. Unchanged word.

Teacher:

Write down examples from dictation and do your own analysis of conjunctions.

1) I married him, only to disobey my father.

2) For three days the hunters did not kill a single duck, but but shot a badger.

3) If a let's meet and I will be free, I will kiss your hands with joy.

4) The box played for a long time, then stopping then again filling the house with a mysterious ringing.

5) A breeze blew from the sea, and the moon stood like a clean horn behind the long street of the village.

6) There is a young spring on the planet, as if the flowers of the multicolored earth have blossomed on the streets of our Moscow.

7) I'll be back when will spread the branches in the spring of our white garden.

8) I'm sorry what I fruitlessly waste the purity and tenderness of better days.

9) Here is a disgraced house, where I lived with my poor nurse.

10) There was little snow, snowstorms too .

5)Summarizing.

Teacher:

So, today we repeated the categories of unions in meaning and structure, performed morphological analyzes of some unions. In the next lessons, we will continue the theme of "Union", get acquainted with the spelling of unions and their use in simple and complex sentences.

6) Homework: ex. 389, 395.

7)Grading.

Lesson planning:

1) Organizational moment……………………………………1 min.

2) Checking homework…………………………….10 min.

3) Frontal survey………………………………………….15 min.

4) Performing morphological analysis………………...15 min.

5) Summing up………………………………………….2 min.

6) Homework…………………………………………..1 min.

7) Grading…………………………………………...1 min.

The union is disassembled according to the following plan:

· I. Part of speech. Grammatical role (for what it serves).

II. Morphological features: a) coordinating or subordinating; b) simple or compound.

· Sample morphological analysis of the union:

We all jumped up from our chairs, but again there was a surprise: the sound of many steps was heard, which meant that the hostess had not returned alone, but it was really strange, since she herself appointed this hour (F. M. Dostoevsky).

I. But - union

II. Coordinative, adversative, simple, connects parts of a complex sentence.

I. What is the union

II. Subordinating, explanatory, simple, invariable, connects parts of a complex sentence.

I. A - union

II. Coordinating, adversative, simple, invariable, connects parts of a complex sentence.

I. Since - union

II. Subordinating, causes, compound, connects parts of a complex sentence.

Union

Union - a service part of speech that connects homogeneous members in a simple sentence and simple sentences in a complex sentence. Unions are divided into coordinating and subordinating.

writing unions connect homogeneous members and equal simple sentences as part of a complex (compound).

Subordinating unions connect simple sentences in a complex (complex-subordinate) sentence, of which one is subordinate in meaning to the other, i.e. from one sentence to the next one can pose a question.
Unions consisting of one word are called simple: a, and, but, or, either, how, what, when, barely, as if etc., and conjunctions consisting of several words, composite: due to the fact that, due to the fact that, while, due to the fact that, despite the fact that and etc.

Coordinating conjunctions

Coordinating conjunctions are divided into three groups:

1. Connecting: and; yes (meaning and); not only but; like... so;

2. opposing: a; but; yes (meaning but); though; but;

3. Dividing: or; or or; or; then ... then; not that... not that.

Parts of some unions ( like ... so and, not only ... but also, not that ... not that etc.) are located at different homogeneous members or in different parts complex proposal.

Subordinating conjunctions

Subordinating conjunctions are divided into the following groups:

1. Causal: because; because of; because; due to the fact that; thanks to; due to the fact that; due to the fact that and others;

2. Target: to (to); to; so that etc.;

3. Temporary: when; only; just; bye; barely, etc.;

4. Conditional: if; if; once; whether; how soon, etc.;

5. Comparative: how; as if; like; as if; exactly, etc.;

6. Explanatory: what; to; like others;

7. concessions: although; although; no matter how, etc.

Morphological analysis of the union

I. Part of speech. General value.
II. Morphological features:
1) Composing or subordinating;
2) The unchangeable word.
III. syntactic role.

Particle- a service part of speech that introduces various meanings, emotional shades into a sentence or serves to form word forms.

· one General properties particles

2 Particle Discharges

3 Classification of particles by origin

o 3.1 Antiderivatives

o 3.2 Non-primitives

4 Classification of particles by composition

o 4.1 Simple

o 4.2 Composite

o 4.3 Dissected

o 4.4 Undivided

o 4.5 Phraseological particles (phraseological particles)

5 Hyphen and separate spelling particles

General properties of particles[edit | edit wiki text]

In the class of particles, constant auxiliary (non-significant) words are combined, which:

Express a wide variety of subjective-modal characteristics: motivation, subjunctiveness, conditionality, desirability, as well as evaluation of the message or its individual parts;

participate in the expression of the purpose of the message (questioning), as well as in the expression of affirmation or negation;

characterize an action or state by its course in time, by completeness or incompleteness, effectiveness or ineffectiveness of its implementation.

The listed particle functions are grouped:

in the function of shaping

in the function of various communication characteristics messages.

Common to all these functions is that in all cases they contain

the meaning of the relationship

relation (relatedness) of an action, a state or a whole message to reality,

relationship between the speaker and the reported

moreover, both these types of relations are very often combined in the meaning of one particle.

characteristic feature many particles is that in their structure and functions they are close to adverbs, conjunctions or interjections and cannot always be strictly opposed to them; in many cases, particles also approach introductory words.

The meaning of a particle as a separate word is the relation that it expresses in a sentence.

Particle discharges[edit | edit wiki text]

In accordance with the above functions, the following main categories of particles are distinguished:

1. shaping particles(let, let, let's, yes, let's, would, b, happened):

· formative forms of words;

· forming degrees of comparison of adjectives and adverbs;

2. negative particles(not, no, not at all, far from, not at all);

3. particles that characterize the trait(action or state) according to its course in time, in terms of completeness or incompleteness, effectiveness or ineffectiveness of implementation;

4. modal particles:

· interrogative particles(whether, really, unless);

· pointer particles(here, out);

· clarifying particles(precisely, exactly, just, exactly, exactly);

· excretory and restrictive particles(only, only, exclusively, almost, only);

· exclamation particles(what for, how);

· amplifying particles(not even, not, after all, after all, after all, everything);

· mitigation-ka ( bring it on, pour it on)-then (milk runs out); worders -s are also used for this purpose (surcharge-s), derived from the abbreviated treatment "sir";

· doubt(hardly, hardly);

· incentive particles(let, let, come on (those)).

It is essential that modal (evaluative, expressive) meanings in one form or another are also present in particles of negative, interrogative, characterizing the action by its course or effectiveness, in replica particles.

Classification of particles by origin[edit | edit wiki text]

Primitives[edit | edit wiki text]

The primitives include the simplest (with a few exceptions) monosyllabic particles, in modern language having no living word-formation connections and formal relationships with words of other classes.

These are particles: bish (simple), would, vish (simple), yes (as part of the command form), de (colloquial), say (colloquial), same, in (simple), ish ( colloquial), -ka, (colloquial), no, I suppose (simple), no, really, let it go (simple), no, well, this (simple), still, those (simple), something, really, tea (simple).

Non-primitives[edit | edit wiki text]

All other particles are not primitive.

Classification of particles by composition[edit | edit wiki text]

Simple[edit | edit wiki text]

Simple particles are particles that consist of one word. Simple particles include all primitive particles, as well as particles that, to varying degrees, reveal living connections with conjunctions, pronominal words, adverbs, verbs or prepositions. In addition to primitive particles, simple particles include: union (part of speech) | a, good, more, more, literally, it happens, it happened, it was, as if, after all, in (simple), at all, out, that's, like, everything , everything, where, look, yes (not as part of the form command. incl.), come on (those), even, give (those), really, only, if, still, know, and, or, exactly, how, what , where, okay, is it (particle) | is it better, nothing (simple, questions), nothing, nothing, but, however, finally, it, go (simple), positive, simple, straight, let, let , perhaps, decisively, exactly, the very thing, to yourself, rather, as if, completely, thanks (meaning good), so, there, to you, too, only, exactly, at least, of which, purely (simple), that, so that to, ek, this.

As already mentioned, all these particles have close external and internal connections with other classes of words: they contain elements of meanings to varying degrees.

adverbs (literally, good, in (simple), at all, out, here, where, really, only, still, exactly, how, where, okay, nothing, nothing, finally, positively, simply, directly, decisively, completely , quite, so, there, good),

pronominal words (everything, everything, what, it, the most, to yourself, to you, what, this),

verbs (it happens, it happened, it was, come on (those), give (those), look (those), know),

unions (but, good, as if, after all, yes, even if, but, and, or, whether, but, however, let, let, perhaps, exactly, as if, too, only, exactly, at least that, so that , to),

Comparatives (more, more, better, sooner: Rather die than agree; Rather, vacation!),

prepositions (like: Does someone call?),

interjections (ek, thanks: They, what a heat! You won’t find a place. Thank you, I slept a little in the cellar. N. Uspensky).

Sometimes in the same word the proximity and interweaving of the meanings of particle and conjunction, particle and adverb, particle and verb, particles and pronouns, particles and interjections are so close that the opposition to each other of such meanings as belonging to words of different classes turns out to be illegal, and the word must qualify as "particle-conjunction", "particle-adverb", "particle-pronoun", etc.;

Compounds[edit | edit wiki text]

Particles formed from two (less often - more) words:

two particles

particle and union

Particles and prepositions

particles and a verb form or adverb isolated from its class.

Compound particles can be inseparable - their components in a sentence cannot be separated by other words, or separable: their components in a sentence can be separated by other words. Phraseologism particles stand out inside the compound particles: these are several merged together service words(or service words and adverbs isolated from their classes, forms of pronominal words or verbs), there are no living relations between which in the modern language; such particles may also be separable or non-separable.

Dismembered[edit | edit wiki text]

Their components in a sentence can be separated by other words. Dissected particles:

I wish (I wish it would rain!; I wish it would rain!);

here and (Here's a friend for you!; Here's the result for you!; Did you believe him? So believe people after that!);

like this (That's the order!; That's the order!; Here we have a garden, such a garden!; Here we have made it so friendly!);

almost (almost late; almost broke his head);

almost (Almost for the first time in his life he lied);

how not (How not to understand!; How can I not know the way!);

no matter how (No matter how it rains);

If only (If only there would be no rain!);

not enough (simple) (I started ringing the bell, didn’t stop it a little. Dot.; From fear, I didn’t even fall to the ground a little. Lesk.);

let (Let yourself sing!);

rather (Hurry up spring!; Spring would be sooner!);

so (it breathes with peace; so he did not recognize me);

if only (Just don’t be late!) only and (Only talking about the trip; Only about the trip and talking);

at least (Though I wouldn’t grumble!);

almost (was) not (almost broke a leg);

almost (He almost became a big boss now).

Particles are always dismembered

don't we (shouldn't we rest?),

not the same (Do not spend the night here!).

Phraseological particles:

no-no and (yes and) (No-no yes and will come to visit; No-no grandfather and remember);

what kind of (What kind of news is this?; What kind of character do you have!);

what of (of what) (What of his promises to me!; now what of the fact that he returned?).

It is necessary to distinguish from composite particles various, easily arising and easily disintegrating complexes grouped around a simple particle, which are characteristic primarily of modal particles; for example:

already- already and, well, so, so, so ... well;

how- yes, how, how, how, how, how, how;

like- like, like, like, like, like, like;

Indivisible[edit | edit wiki text]

their components in a sentence cannot be separated by other words.

otherwise (- Aren't you afraid? - Otherwise I'm afraid !; Will they let me spend the night? - Otherwise they won't let me in);

without that (He is already a silent person, but here he completely closed himself. Polev .; There is no time to wait, without that we are already late);

it would be (simple.) (It would be for me not to stay, but to go home!);

only (Time is only an hour);

look and (colloquial) (waited, waited, looked and fell asleep);

far from (far from sure of success; far from being a beauty);

Divi would (simple) (Divi would know the matter, otherwise he’s an ignoramus!);

to what (How good the forest is! How tired you are!);

would be good;

if (If not for the war!);

still (They don’t touch you. - You still would touch!; Good catch! - Still not good!);

and there is (simple) (- Didn't recognize it, you see? - Didn't recognize and is. Bazhov; - Look, guys, Pika! - Pika is. Fad.);

and so (Don't be angry, I repent anyway; Why does he need money, he has a lot anyway);

and then (They don’t let them go to the skating rink; I saw it for a long time, and then briefly; Talk to him. - And then I’ll talk);

as is (simple) (Everything as it is, you said correctly. Bazhov; - Frozen? - As is, frozen);

just (I came just in time; I'm afraid of the service: you'll just fall under responsibility. Turg.);

how so (- Goodbye. - How so goodbye?);

where as (Where how fun!);

okay;

on what (What is cunning, but even then he made a mistake);

no way;

unlikely;

by no means (by no means a beauty);

simply (He simply laughs at us);

so (so he didn’t show up?);

so (- I have all the tobacco. - Is that all?);

either not (or not life!);

something (Something glad !; That's what I look at, he calmed down);

there too (There, from the laughing ones: I said something: he began to laugh. Mushroom .; The boy, but he argues there too);

already (You did it yourself. - Already yourself?; This is a disease. - Already a disease!);

grab and (While they were going, grab and it started to rain);

well (- Let's go? - Well, let's go; I agree, well);

or something (Call, or what ?; Help or something !; Are you deaf?);

When you know the unions, then you will be able to put commas without difficulty. If, of course, you can apply punctuation rules!

But unions are very difficult to distinguish from pronouns and adverbs, homonymous particles (as, only, though, same, and, a) and prepositions.

It is necessary to analyze the words in a sentence: particles usually express semantic shades (amplifying, restrictive), and unions connect homogeneous members and parts of a complex sentence.

Unions can also be similar to pronouns and adverbs (what; how, when, barely, yet), to combinations of prepositions and pronouns (but - for that, because - from that, because - by that, moreover - moreover, moreover - with what), pronouns and particles (to - what, too - the same), adverbs and particles (also - the same).

There are few universal tricks to distinguish alliances. First: to determine its service role, that is, what it binds. Second: replace it with a synonym union. The particle can be rearranged to another place or completely omitted.

We reason like this. In the sentence: Everyone is late, me too. - the word ALSO can be replaced by a synonym AND (Everyone was late, and I.). In another sentence (I completed the same task as you.), the SAME particle can be omitted.

In fact, unions need to be recognized “by sight”, to distinguish their groups by origin, structure, use and meaning. Those unions that cannot be divided into morphemes are called non-derivative (a, but, and, yes, either, or, however, for, if). Derivatives come from combinations with pronouns, adverbs, prepositions (to, also, because, due to the fact that).

If the union consists of one word, then it is simple (and, yes, as if, although), of several - compound (due to the fact that, despite the fact that, because, since). There are no complex unions.

If the union is used once, then it is single, if it is repeated two or more times, then it is called recurring (neither ... nor, or ... either, not that ... not that), but if it breaks up into two parts, then double (not only ..., but; as ..., so; if ..., then; than ..., those; insofar ..., since; although ..., but) .

All unions are divided into two groups: coordinating (connecting homogeneous members of a sentence and parts of a complex sentence) and subordinating (connecting parts of a complex sentence).

Coordinating conjunctions convey different meanings:

1) connecting express enumeration	and, yes \u003d and, and-and, no-no, like ..., so, not only ..., but also
2) adversative - oppositions and differences	but, but, yes = but, however, the same, but
3) separating - mutual exclusion, alternation	or, or-or, either, or-either, not that, not that, that, whether, whether, whether
4) connectives are used to express additions, comments	yes, and, too, also, also, moreover, also
5) explanatory - for explanation	that is, namely, or, somehow

There are much more subordinating conjunctions than coordinating ones:

1) explanatory	What, to, as if, whether
2) temporary	When, as soon as, as soon as, while, since, after, until, until, barely, before
3) causal	Because, since, for, because, due to the fact that, because, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, due to the fact that
4) target	So that, so that, in order to, so that, so that
5) conditional	If, once, if, provided that, if, if, if, if, if, when
6) comparative	As, as if, as if, exactly, as if, as if, as if
7) concessions	Although, at least, let, let, despite the fact that, despite the fact that, no matter how
8) consequences	So, before that, as a result of which

PLAN OF MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF UNIONS

I. Part of speech. General grammatical meaning (in which sentence it is used, scheme).

II. Morphological features.

1. Discharge by composition (simple or composite).

2. Discharge by origin (non-derivative or derivative).

3. Discharge by function (composing or subordinating).

4. Rank by value.

5. Discharge by use (single, repeated, double).

Using sentences from Jan Larry's fascinating story "The Extraordinary Adventures of Karik and Vali", we will show examples of parsing different alliances. Do not forget that the union must be written out in its entirety if it is compound or double. We will not draw diagrams here due to technical difficulties.