To answer this question, use a comparison, perhaps not entirely correct, but figurative. Why is the fire burning? First, it is absolutely necessary that there is fuel, that is, a combustible material. Secondly, high temperature to "start" the initial oxidation reaction, and then it will go on its own. Finally, thirdly, it is necessary to ensure that water does not fall on the flaring flame, otherwise it will go out.

In your situation (preconditions, the emergence and development of the conflict) "combustible material" will serve as a clash or simply a mismatch of interests, views, habits of the conflicting parties. Human nature is such that it is his views and habits that he considers correct and most natural. Therefore, when faced with a different point of view on a particular issue, problem, he often instinctively sees it as a challenge directed against him personally. It goes without saying that the opponent can behave in the same way. In this case, the "fire hazard" increases sharply.

Well, the role of the very outbreak, which gives a high temperature, is played by the so-called "conflict generator", that is, a careless or harsh word, a dismissive gesture, a smile or demonstrative silence. Of course, it is not at all necessary that one of the listed factors (or even a whole series) will certainly provoke the onset of a conflict, likening that flash or the finger pulling the trigger. In some cases, the conflict can be avoided. But sooner or later it will flare up.

Now, with regard to the conditions conducive to the intensification and growth of the conflict that has arisen. If the side against which a harsh word, a contemptuous look or gesture, a grin, etc. was directed, shows patience, generosity, refrains from a retaliatory attack in the same spirit, or, even more so, tries to translate the beginning conflict into a joke, then she with brilliance will play the role of water, extinguishing the flaming flame. Unfortunately, this happens very rarely. Human nature is such that those who consider themselves offended (all the more offended), in 99% of cases will want to repay the offender with "the same coin". And even more "weighty". At the same time, he often acts according to the rule: "The best defense is an attack." Word for word, and now a hot fire of a full-scale conflict is already blazing. With mutual insults and personal communication. Well, if it doesn't come to assault! But a spoiled mood is guaranteed in any case.

Therefore, no matter how difficult it is, you still need to stop in time. Remember that any fire is easier to prevent than to extinguish.

(356 words) We all know that the confrontation between the individual and the collective is inevitable, because it is difficult for society to accept a person who does not want to adapt to it. But how does this struggle manifest itself? It is often difficult for the uninitiated to notice it, since none of the participants advertises their antipathy. Conflict takes place in the shadow of everyday restraint, when tension is only felt, not negotiated.

In Bulgakov's story “ dog's heart»The conflict between the individual and the society is obvious only to the reader, since both sides pretend that nothing special is happening. In Soviet society, everyone is equal, but class hatred makes itself felt in the relationship between proletarians and intellectuals. Philip Philipovich works from home, so he occupies a large room. His neighbors are jealous, and they are trying with all their might to deprive him of this privilege. Preobrazhensky, in response to these tricks, resorts to the help of high-ranking patients. Outwardly, their wrangling with Shvonder looks like an ordinary everyday conflict, but in fact it is a struggle between a collective and a person, where the confrontation is of an ideological nature. The professor, with all his achievements, refutes the principles of equality hammered into the heads of the workers through propaganda: they are not initially equal to him, at least in terms of intelligence. Therefore, new people uproot the bourgeois way of life of the old world in retaliation for the fact that they will never get its luxury. This process manifests itself in the form of local clashes based on housing conditions.

In Gorky's story "Chelkash" the hero deliberately leaves society, being on the other side of the law. He sees in the settled and measured life of the common people the yoke of a slave, therefore he seeks freedom in vagrancy and loneliness. If on his part there is no aggression towards the collective, then on the other hand he is pursued by clear condemnation. A typical representative of society repels him, depriving the tramp of the status of a person. According to Gavrila, the thief is so insignificant that he can be killed with a twinge of conscience, because no one cares about him. The renegade turns out to be more virtuous than the peasant, but the majority always sees only the outer side, and the Chelkashi are doomed to be misunderstood. The conflict here manifests itself in open hostility, which, however, was only expressed in private.

The conflict between a person and a team is often expressed in small domestic strife, nevertheless, revealing the essence of the worldview of each side. However, it can acquire other dimensions, turning into an active confrontation with aggressive attacks and fatal consequences. We must try to avoid extremes and strive to understand each other.

Theme: "Nature creates man, but develops and forms his society" (VG Belinsky) The work of the following authors is used in the argumentation: F.M. Dostoevsky I.S. Turgenev

Introduction: Each of us lives in society, in society. Family, work collective, friends and acquaintances. The top of the pyramid is the state. Its traditions, culture, religion, laws affect our formation, regardless of whether we accept them or not. This is one of the reasons for the emerging conflicts between man and society.

Another is indifference, which often characterizes the attitude of the state towards its individual citizens. Literature has always been not indifferent to the problem of relations between man and society.

Many works by authors of various nationalities can be cited as an example. This is an international topic. In Russian literature, such interest is especially noticeable during that period of its development, which is usually called golden. I.S. Turgenev introduced into her a type of person whom he called a nihilist.

The main character in the works of I.A. Goncharova also does not accept the surrounding reality. Ilya Ilyich Oblomov prefers not to notice her. Unfortunately, or fortunately, other people prevailed in the history of Russia. They considered that they can and have the right to change this reality in the interests of a certain class. The desires and goals of those who could prevent this were not taken into account. Such an ideology inevitably leads to dictatorship. She can carry not only evil, but good intentions do not justify the childish tear about which F.M. Dostoevsky.

Among the characters in almost all of Fyodor Mikhailovich's main books, there is a person who no longer asks himself the question of what he has the right to do. In "Demons", for example, this is Pyotr Verhovensky. This is no longer the "little man" that Pushkin and Gogol wrote about. He can be compared with Turgenev's Bazarov, who does not care how society treats him. He realized what he himself can do with this society.

Argument: As an example, I would like to cite another hero F.M. Dostoevsky. This is Rodion Raskolnikov. Having committed a crime, he still realizes that he is worthy of punishment. It's complicated. It's easier to continue to indulge your pride, like the "demon" Verhovensky. But what drove the beggar student to commit such atrocity? First of all, the indifference of society and the state to him.

Not possessing such fortitude as his friend Dmitry Razumikhin, he succumbed to the ideas set forth in the brochure he read. Considering himself a person who "has the right", he decided to use the money of an old woman useless for the world in order to change the surrounding reality, to make it better. Inflamed consciousness, nervous exhaustion. This did not allow me to ask myself a simple question: is it within my power to do this?

There is a reason to compare Raskolnikov with Bazarov. This is disbelief in God, atheism. Turgenev's hero believes in science, but it cannot satisfy a person who has spiritual needs. When the state and society leave such people face to face with life, the Verkhovenskys appear. And the more there are, the more likely they are to actually change the world.

Conclusion: Even "little people" like Akaki Akakievich from Gogol's "Overcoat" are capable of rebellion. Only they make it funny. But if you continue to mock such people, the greatcoat can be worn by completely different ones. Therefore, the state, at least for the sake of self-preservation, should pay attention to all who consider themselves its citizens.

What is society? And how is the conflict between man and society manifested? In my opinion, society is a form of uniting people with common interests, values ​​and goals. Human societies are characterized by a model of social relations between people. However, due to the uniqueness of each person, disagreements occur, leading to conflict between individuals and society. Sometimes such clashes become too serious and lead to dire consequences.

Many writers have addressed this topic in their works. A.S. Griboyedov in the play "Woe from Wit" also discusses conflict situations of people. Man and society is one of the central problems in the comedy of A.S. Griboyedov. How should relations between people in society be built? And is it worth it to agree with those values ​​that are important in society? The questions are relevant to this day, as each person is looking for his position in society.

So Alexander Andreevich Chatsky opposes the entire Famus society. He does not accept his principles, the essence of which lies in material values, in achieving a higher position in the world. Service for Famusian societies does not consist in serving their homeland, for them it is just career advancement. Therefore, they do not seriously do business. Even love is not taken seriously here. “He who is poor is not a match for you,” Famusov tells his daughter. Any disagreement with generally accepted laws is perceived as “madness”. The opinion of the entire Moscow society is dearer to them than sincerity, justice, honesty. Chatsky is offended that his beloved house, where he spent his childhood, suddenly turned out to be a stranger. But the hero does not even try to adapt to society. He bravely defends his principles. This is not Molchalin with his sycophancy, hypocrisy, duplicity, who has learned well how to live. Chatsky attracts readers with the ability to be true to himself, while remaining a bright personality. Everyone decides how to build relationships with people, how to determine their place in life. But I believe that people are simply obliged to live according to the laws of morality, supporting everything that is morally correct, decent and speaking out against lies, evil, hostility, no matter how difficult it may be. This work is a vivid example of how a person, defending and defending his opinion and views, can unexpectedly for himself come into conflict with society, the principles of which for life are completely different.

I will give an example from another literary work... Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin in his novel in verse "Eugene Onegin" vividly emphasizes the image of the protagonist, who is a "superfluous" person in society. Eugene Onegin differs from the environment in the city, he is not interested in secular balls, empty talk, stupid gossip. He is smart and educated. Onegin does not understand the values ​​of society. He has his own interests, he loves to read philosophical books, to develop himself. deal with the economy. Simply put, he is sufficiently enlightened in all pressing topics. Eugene Onegin- very interesting person, but in society he did not find his place, since he is very different from people in the city and in the countryside. They all appreciate appearance, status in society, the amount of money in your pocket. Eugene Onegin and all the people around him have different views on life. In this regard, some disagreements involuntarily occur between them, which smoothly flow into a conflict. This work is a shining example of how people, having own views on life, expressing their opinion, regardless of the opinion of others, they can come to mutual misunderstanding, alienation.

Summing up my essay, I will emphasize once again: people often conflict because of disagreements. However, a person lives in a society in which he becomes a person, realizes his abilities, achieves goals, dreams, suffers, loves. To be needed by society, not to isolate oneself from it, not to oppose oneself to it - this is the noble goal of man. Awareness of their unity with people, people, country makes life conflict-free and meaningful.

Updated: 2018-04-16

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, select the text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thus, you will provide invaluable benefits to the project and other readers.

Thank you for the attention.