In war, all methods are good. Electronic textbooks on the Russian language. See what "The end justifies the means" in other dictionaries
Being able to set and achieve goals is a very good quality for a person. Sometimes this is exactly what talented, intelligent potential personalities lack in order to achieve success and fulfill their plans. Everything is there, but there is no perseverance, firmness and patience. In such cases, it is the support of loved ones that helps not to give up, but to work to achieve success.
Modern society is focused on success. Children from the first years of life are taught on programs early development, later they are given to all kinds of courses that develop skills, skills, teach critical thinking, and so on. To be an intelligent, erudite, successful person is good and right, and you need to work on it. The main thing in this race is to teach a child to be a person who knows how to love, respect, make friends, appreciate other people and their work.
There is a popular saying “the end justifies the means”, which is widely used in the world. Competition at school, institute, and work is not always fair and open. Children will face this and it is important here:
- Prepare them for the fact that not everyone will act honestly, the solution to the situation will not always be fair. Let the children know about this.
- Help to be strong, so as not to switch to the methods and strategies of this sinful world, for the sake of your victory. Do not sacrifice friendship, loyalty, your principles, relationships with loved ones and relationships with God, but, on the contrary, take care of it with all your might.
There is a good example from the Bible - King David. He was told through the prophet that he would be king. Time passed, and David not only did not become a king, he is not even an ordinary shepherd, he is a fugitive who is hiding from the current king Saul. The whole situation is unfair to David. David cannot be accused of infidelity or lack of initiation, he is a good and faithful warrior. Saul's attacks are unfair, and David's position is unfair. And in this difficult both emotionally and physically, David has the opportunity to take revenge on King Saul, to answer with justice and enter into his own, which God has prepared for him. But for this you need to kill King Saul. With all the desire and all the open possibilities, David makes a decision that will not allow him to overstep his principles, will not allow God to be grieved. He leaves King Saul alive and waits for a solution to this situation from God. It is necessary to explain to the children that even when they are faced with difficult situations, sometimes a way out will open that is not from God. In this case, you just need to be firm and strong and wait for God's release.
- Help children make the first and foremost goal in their lives to please God. Check all your goals and methods, and desires with this parameter. Does what I do please God? Do the methods, thoughts, and motives with which I do this please God? So it will be easier for a child, and an adult, to keep the right course of his life. When we learn to measure everything by the Word of God, then God Himself will lead us to a spacious place, give us success, help, support and give strength.
And, although this seems like a fairly mature topic, the same problems happen in children in early age... Minimize the blame on a brother or sister, so that they do not get punished; write off the assignment to get a good grade; take something away from another, so that you yourself will be fun and joyful.
Help and encourage children to set goals for themselves. Help and support them in achieving these goals. Teach kids that no matter how big the goal is, the methods of achieving it should not contradict God's Word. Reaching heights, it is important not to lose friendship, trust, mercy, relationship with God and people.
I bring to your attention a story entitled “The main thing is to do! And the rest is nonsense! "
Happy viewing. Peace, love and wisdom from God in everything.
War is, without a doubt, one of the most terrible tests that can befall a person. Nothing brings so much misfortune, so much sorrow and suffering, as their wars bring. From small tribal skirmishes to the catastrophic conflicts of the 20th century, they have plagued humanity throughout our history. In addition to the colossal risk to life, war is also the hardest test of the human psyche. To remain a man at the front, when comrades are dying around every day, or in the rear, when you constantly live in fear for your loved ones, afraid to receive a fatal letter from the front - only a truly strong-minded person can withstand this. I believe that the consequentialist principle "in war, all means are good" is a fundamentally wrong view of the world, especially in the context of real military operations.
Talking about war, it is difficult not to recall one of the greatest works of Russian and world literature - "War and Peace" by L.
Our experts can check your essay on USE criteria
Experts of the site Kritika24.ru
Teachers of leading schools and acting experts of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.
N. Tolstoy. Tolstoy's ideas of non-violence have made a huge contribution to Russian philosophy, and are also reflected in the characters of many of the heroes of this work. The highest manifestation of moral qualities and philanthropy is the episode in which Natasha Rostova, a person with an extremely wealthy inner peace, in tears, persuades his parents to give all the carts that were at the disposal of the Rostov family to the wounded soldiers, who otherwise would have awaited inevitable death in French captivity. In this scene, the goal is to evacuate Moscow at the lowest possible cost, but in order to achieve this goal, the Rostovs would have to deny help to the soldiers. This did not happen only thanks to Natasha, who was able to convince the whole family, and dispose of the supplies fairly.
Another episode, incredibly difficult for both the reader and the heroes, we meet in the epic novel "Quiet Flows the Don" by Mikhail Sholokhov. Here the heroes face an even more difficult test - a civil, "fratricidal" war. Ilya Bunchuk is an example of a person who is ready to do anything for the sake of the party and "the fight against the bourgeois system." He is engaged in agitation at the front, trains the militia in the rear, and makes every effort to suppress the white movement. However, even he is unable to withstand the work of the commandant of the revolutionary tribunal. After a week of constant shootings of the White Guards, Bunchuk's psyche was completely shaken. He suddenly realized what a terrible sin he had committed, "bringing the revolution to the masses." The death of his beloved finally breaks him: death for him becomes a happy occasion, a deliverance from suffering.
Thus, using the example of two different works, we were convinced that, in spite of any circumstances, the most important thing is to maintain basic moral guidelines and not turn from a man into a beast. I would like to end with a quote from a textbook on philosophy: “A person who violates fundamental moral principles undoubtedly acts against himself, since he destroys his psyche as a result of a constant conflict between consciousness and subconsciousness. He cannot avoid this conflict, even if he convinces himself that he does not care about high morals. "
Updated: 2017-09-25
Attention!
Thank you for your attention.
If you notice an error or typo, select the text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thus, you will be of invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.
End justifies the means
End justifies the means
From Latin: Finis sanctificat media.
Traditionally, it is believed that these words belong to the famous Italian thinker, historian and statesman Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527), the author of the famous treatises "Sovereign" and "Discourse on the first decade of Titus Livy". But this is a mistake - there is no such expression in the creative heritage of this outstanding political scientist of the Middle Ages.
In fact, this saying belongs to the Jesuit Eekobar and is the motto of the Jesuit order and, accordingly, the basis of their morality (see: Velikovich L. N. Black Guard of the Vatican. M., 1985).
Encyclopedic Dictionary of winged words and expressions. - M .: "Lokid-Press"... Vadim Serov. 2003.
End justifies the means
The idea of this expression, which is the basis of the morality of the Jesuits, was borrowed by them from the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), who wrote in his book "On the Citizen" (1642): " Since the one who is denied the right to use the necessary means is useless and the right to strive for the goal, it follows from this that since everyone has the right to self-preservation, then everyone has the right to use all means and commit any act, without which he is not able to protect myself". The Jesuit Father Hermann Busenbaum in the essay" Foundations of Moral Theology "(1645) wrote:" To whom the goal is allowed, the means are also allowed.".
Dictionary of winged words... Plutex. 2004.
See what "The end justifies the means" in other dictionaries:
- "The end justifies the means" catch phrase originally owned by Niccolo Machiavelli Il fine giustifica i mezzi. This expression is found in a number of authors: The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588 1679) The German theologian Hermann ... Wikipedia
Adverch, number of synonyms: 3 the game is worth the candle (6) the game is worth the candle (6) ... Synonym dictionary
End justifies the means- wings. sl. The idea of this expression, which is the basis of the morality of the Jesuits, was borrowed by them from the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), who wrote in his book On the Citizen (1642): “Since those who are denied the right to apply the necessary ... Versatile additional practical Dictionary I. Mostitsky
end justifies the means- about justifying immoral ways to achieve goals. Tracing paper from Italian. The authorship is attributed to the writer and politician of Italy N. Machiavelli. This idea was expressed by him in the work "Sovereign" (1532). Similar thoughts are found ... ... Phraseology reference
Spread. On justifying immoral ways to achieve goals. BMS 1998, 612 ... Big dictionary Russian sayings
The problem expressed in the well-known maxim "The end justifies the means" and is associated with the value aspect of the relationship between C. and S. and, accordingly, with the choice and assessment of means in expedient activity. Regarding the solution to this problem in the popular ... Philosophical Encyclopedia
The goal is the image of the desired future, the ideal result that political actors strive for, which is the motive behind the activity. The goal in politics, in addition to motivational, also fulfills organizational, mobilization ... ... Political science. Dictionary.
Wed To get rid of it there are many means ... The goal sanctifies the means ... Our brotherhood allows Us to resort to a dagger or poison in cases like that. Gr. A. Tolstoy. Don Juan. 1. Wed Some Jesuits argue that any remedy is good, if only ... ... Michelson's Big Explanatory Phraseological Dictionary
Adverb, number of synonyms: 3 game is not worth the candle (11) impractical (14) ... Synonym dictionary
One of the elements of behavior and consciousness. human activity, which characterizes the anticipation of the result of activity in thinking and the ways of its implementation with the help of a definition. funds. Ts. Acts as a way to integrate various actions ... ... Philosophical Encyclopedia
Books
- The end justifies the means, Eugene Monk. The end justifies the means - says the leader of the criminal group Monk. And if so, then any methods are good. Including the dirtiest ones - murder, bribery, blackmail. The Monk's competitors ...
In this war, the rivalry of the clans became especially acute. The emergence of fighting clans, their prestige, and, especially, their control over territories led to the fact that the clans are ready to wrest victory from each other at a high price. But at what cost?
Someone takes the organization and coordination, intra-clan work and strengthening the fighting spirit. And someone ...
Today, the members of the Elfius and Titans clans will undergo our own investigation!
At the beginning of the war, the Kingdom of Far East and the Horde fought for leadership in the clan standings. But then, unexpectedly, the Titans clan overtook and overtook everyone, and now they are increasing their advantage. And Elfius is not far behind. What is the secret of their success? In well-coordinated work? But with an equal number, in a few days it is extremely difficult to win back 10 million from the Horde and the Far-away, and in the same Far-away and the Horde, the organization is also not lame. And in Elfius and in the Titans, they found a way out - to bypass the rules set for BC. Why fight on equal terms when these conditions can be improved for yourself!
The principle is simple - "mercenaries" are accepted. After 7 battles, on the same day, the "mercenaries" are immediately kicked out and others are accepted, and so on. That is, with the number of clans at each moment of time being the same 250 people, up to 300 people can fight per day per clan!
That is, the overlap over other clans is about 10-20%. (Titans for 2.5 last days- 27 "receptions-deductions", while the elfius has about 130!). And sometimes this advantage is enough to snatch victory for a sector on the flag, on each of which all clans throw their best forces!
I know people who did not sleep at night, sitting in the little world or skype, spending energy on organizing in order to capture and hold the sectors in an incredible struggle. And sometimes they lacked quite a bit!
Yes, in other clans there is also a process of expelling old clans and accepting new ones, but this is a work routine, and not a planned purposeful policy. And they try to take it on a permanent basis, for a long time - and not for one day.
Others just throw away a lot of money, creating a different kind of advantage! That it’s a pity for other people's money? Are you jealous? - will say in these clans. We have found a way that no one forbids to gain an advantage over others - and, perhaps, we will be right in our own way.
Perhaps this is not a violation at all in letter, but in spirit? Is this in the spirit of fair fighting? We do not know - and let the readers express their opinion with their comments!
When fighting clans appeared, the administration clearly stated the condition - 250 people in a fighting clan. For what? Obviously - in order to create equal conditions for the clans in the struggle for the palm, so that the most organized and friendly clan could win in this struggle. The clan where each person could show their best qualities in the team.
But, apparently, many, having found a loophole, decided - we will use it. And many said - no, we want to fight honestly. And they did not begin to round up "pseudo-mercenaries" to the clan to achieve an advantage over others, which in fact should not be!
Is this a violation? From the point of view of fair play - undoubtedly! From the point of view of the laws of the State Internal Affairs Directorate, it is controversial, since in the charter for military clans there is only a finite limitation on the size of the clan. And what principles of playing the game to adhere to is already a matter for each clan and personally for its head.
And what do the participants and heads of other fighting clans think about this problem? In your opinion, does the strategy of inviting a few hours to join the "mercenaries" clan have the right to life? I would like to emphasize once again that the editors expressed their opinion, relying on the ethics of the GVD world, and talking with the heads and members of several clans. The editorial board does not pretend to be a judge and to the ultimate truth, and even more so it does not want to pass a guilty verdict!
Dear players - members and leaders of other fighting clans, do not stand aside, speak up on the pages of our newspaper!
One of the members of the clan Elfius (Skilord) decided to give his opinion on the above. We also give the opinion of the Titans clan.
Skilord's opinion (Elfius).
In my reply to the article "All means are good in war," I would like to show the arguments as opposed to what was said in it.
I will make a reservation right away that I am in favor of prohibiting rotation, because this is not correct in principle. But…
I was confused by the naming of the victory of the clans who made the rotation - dishonest. The rules of war were established by the administrators:
1. Limit of 250 people - at a time.
2. 4500 - for accepting a new clan member.
3. 7 battles of one clan member.
4. Points are awarded for battles fought under the clan sign!
Not a single rule was violated during the war, rotations were not prohibited. Some clans decided to take this opportunity to achieve their goals. After all, the end justifies the means. And this technique is no worse than the reception of gathering people 13+ lvl into the clan, for example.
To say that rotation is a bug. Wrong a priori. We do not have a battle of psychics, and we do not know what the administrators have in mind. Yes, rotation is an oversight of this war, but to say that this is not honest is not correct. Everything was within the framework of the rules and assumptions.
I will also add. Rotation was and is available to all clans. If you do not like the method, then you should not talk about its dishonesty. This is like saying that we do not like to gather crowds of high-level people, let's limit the number of Hays in the clans.
The opinion of the Titans clan.
In the past few days, the Titans clan has had a lot of admissions to clan members and a lot of exclusions from the clan. I will explain what it is connected with.
It's simple - people were excluded by activity and level, so that they would come instead, those who could bring more points to the clan. Regarding the "rotations" there were 4 entrances and exits of their own free will and initiative, the rest, excuse me, is far-fetched.
Introduction: What could be worse than war for humanity? Natural disasters and epidemics are terrible, of course, but they do not depend on human will. War is the concentration of hatred and anger among the people, their destructive outburst. How much grief and tears it brings, how many lives it takes, how many destinies it destroys!
The terrible thing is that innocent people, civilians and children are dying. Our people had to go through many wars, but the First World War, the Civil War and the Second World War were especially destructive and cruel. world war... Many writers, both Russian and foreign, have addressed this topic. They condemn the war, its stinking breath, speak of its perniciousness. But it also happens, as in the Patriotic War - the enemy has come, you need to defend the Motherland. War is inevitable. Are All Means Good? What is possible in a war, what is not?
Arguments: Leo Tolstoy in the epic story "War and Peace" shows ghostly military glory... Andrei Bolkonsky, having come into contact with the abomination of war, understands its inhumanity. As a person with high moral principles, he does not consider every means justified. Napoleon, on the other hand, goes to glory, paved the way with the corpses of soldiers.
Tragic moment from civil war pulls out Mikhail Sholokhov. Ilya Bunchuk strives to defeat the bourgeoisie at any cost, believing that in a war all means are good. His reprisals against the opponents of the revolution are extremely cruel. But the price turned out to be too expensive for him - Ilya lost his mind. The highest value on earth is human life. The death of a person is tantamount to the death of the entire universe. You can not take the life of your own kind and be left without punishment.
War awakens and brings out the low human feelings, the animal fear of death often becomes the cause of betrayal and betrayal. A striking example of this is Alexei Shvabrin from Pushkin's The Captain's Daughter. The fear of death makes him a traitor, nothing remains in him worthy title a nobleman and just a person.
Unnecessarily, the United States detonated nuclear bombs over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to assert its position. Many civilians were killed, including children. Such conduct of the war cannot be justified by anything, nothing threatened the life of the American people. This is simply the sadistic reprisal of the victor over the vanquished, the strong over the weak.
Great Patriotic War Soviet people with Nazi Germany left us with terrible scars and scars in memory of how terrible the means of war can be. Mass extermination of the population, concentration camps, burned down villages, captured youth, robbery and violence - these are the means. Who will return the ruined lives of young people, who will collect the shed tears of widows, mothers, orphans? Who can do it? V Soviet army massacres of the civilian population, looting were forbidden, there was high military discipline. For me personally, this is a sign of moral and moral superiority.
Conclusion: There are inevitable wars when our consent is not asked. Often, our people had to wage wars of liberation, and the main thing in a war is to be able to remain human. Massacres of the civilian population, especially cruel methods of conducting military operations are inadmissible. Above all, human life should be valued.
